search for




 

A Novel Protein Elicitor PeBL2, from Brevibacillus laterosporus A60, Induces Systemic Resistance against Botrytis cinerea in Tobacco Plant
Plant Pathol. J. 2019;35:208-218
Published online June 1, 2019
© 2019 The Korean Society of Plant Pathology.

Ghulam Hussain Jatoi1,2,* , Guo Lihua1, Yang Xiufen1, Muswar Ali Gadhi1, Azhar Uddin Keerio1, Yusuf Ali Abdulle1, and Dewen Qiu1,*

1State Key Laboratory of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, China
2Department of Plant Pathology Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan
Correspondence to: *Dewen Qiu
Phone) 0086-13520642805
E-mail) qiudewen@caas.cn
*Ghulam Hussain Jatoi
Phone) 00923453854538
E-mail) jatoighulamhussain@hotmail.com
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7266-1567

Handling Editor : Sang, Mee Kyung
Received December 8, 2018; Revised February 26, 2019; Accepted March 28, 2019.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract

Here, we reported a novel secreted protein elicitor PeBL2 from Brevibacillus laterosporus A60, which can induce hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana). The ion-exchange chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry were performed for identification of protein elicitor. The 471 bp PeBL2 gene produces a 17.22 kDa protein with 156 amino acids containing an 84-residue signal peptide. Consistent with endogenous protein, the recombinant protein expressed in Escherichia coli induced the typical hypersensitive response (HR) and necrosis in tobacco leaves. Additionally, PeBL2 also triggered early defensive response of generation of reactive oxygen species (H2O2 and O2) and systemic resistance against of B. cinerea. Our findings shed new light on a novel strategy for biocontrol using B. laterosporus A60.

Keywords : Botrytis cinereal, Brevibacillus laterosporus A60, novel protein, PeBL2, protein elicitor activity
Body

Plants live with diverse beneficial microbes in nature, along with complicated environmental surroundings. plants have innate defence mechanisms to resist different harmful pathogens (Cct et al., 2018; Corn et al., 2009; Díeznavajas et al., 2008). Probiotics are very useful in indirectly triggering plant defence responses, which can induce the plant resistant to broad spectrum pathogens (Haas and Défago, 2005; Smolińska and Kowalska, 2018; Ueki et al., 2018). When plant roots are treated with beneficial bacteria, the whole plant becomes resistant, including parts that are above ground, demonstrating the systemic resistance capacity of plants. A broad range of pathogens, including numerous organisms like viruses, bacteria, nematodes, insects, fungi etc., can be resisted by non-pathogens through a process called induced systemic resistance (ISR) (Jain et al., 2013; Ryu et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2018). Apparently the systemic acquired resistance is almost identical to ISR characterized by the motivation through an incompatible pathogen (Kukawka et al., 2018). An extensively studied demonstrated that plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) consists a useful association with the plant root and the rhizosphere (Kloeppe et al., 1999; Ma et al., 2018). Numerous plant species including beans, tomatoes, cucumbers, radishes and Arabidopsis thaliana, can display ISR (Corn et al., 2009; Riera et al., 2018). ISR can triggered by three specific steps: recognition of the elicitor, the signal transduction occurs and the defense related gene expression. Signal transduction mechanisms of ISR remain poorly understood. It has been confirmed that salicylic acid pathway (SA), ethylene pathway (ET) and the jasmonic acid (JA) are different regulatory pathways, and act as core candidates in the signaling system, as well as in the defense response (Lai et al., 2018; Pieterse and van Loon, 1999; Zhang et al., 2018a). SA is considered to be the most prominent signaling molecule having a key role in system resistance as well as local defense reactions (Glazebrook, 2001). Several genes, viz. PR-5, PR-1a and PR-1b, are related to pathogenesis and can be utilized as markers for SA-dependent defenses. The above mentioned JA and ET are also involved in defense response and signaling in plants and play important roles in ISR-mediated signaling pathways (Riera et al., 2018; van Loon et al., 1998). The SA-dependent pathway activation is related to ISR-inducing biocontrol bacteria (Shilina et al., 2018). Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 induced ISR and lead to PR protein accumulation in tobacco plant, indicating the ISR is associated with SA pathway. Much evidence have suggested that ISR and SAR have similar mechanism, which providing an avenue for the extensive studies related to ISR-mediated defense response in future (Hazotte et al., 2018).

The systemic resistance depends on the enhancement of its defensive signals. All signals that are recognized by plant cells and trigger defense responses are considered as elicitors. Different types of organisms in nature, including fungi, bacteria, oomycetes and viruses, can produce elicitors, including different chemical viz. proteins, lipids, glycoproteins, oligosaccharides and peptides (Ellis et al., 2009; Islam et al., 2018; Nürnberger, 1999). Gram positive plant-pathogenic bacteria produce one type of protein elicitor called a hairpin, which is a multifunctional protein (Wang et al., 2015; Wei et al., 1992). More recently, various fungal elicitors, including MoHrip1 from Magnaporthe oryzae, PevD1 from Verticillium dahlia, and Hrip1 from Alternaria tenuissima, respectively, have been shown to activate the defence responses of plants (Kulye et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2018b). Some studies showed that elicitors can also be isolated from probiotics. For example, an ISR-eliciting Bacillus cereus strain produces dimethyl disulphide (DMDS), which plays a key role in ISR to B. cereus C1 L and suppress plant fungal diseases (Huang et al., 2012). Additionally, Pseudomonas fluorescens SS101 produces massetolide A, which shows defensive capacity against Phytophthora infestans in tomato by eliciting ISR (Cui et al., 2018). Bacillus subtilis S499 produces fengycins and surfactants, which have ISR-eliciting defensive capacity (Ongena et al., 2007).

ROS are involved in the hypersensitive response (HR) as well as elicitor signal transduction system (Allen et al., 2004; Hu et al., 2018; Jones and Dangl, 2006). ROS have been associated with the accumulation of plant secondary metabolites and are ultimately required for enhancing plant immunity reactions (Asai et al., 2008; Somasundaram et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2005). The second stage in the activation concerning defence response occurs within few hours of elicitor ingestion. This stage includes the activation of defence-associated genes related to cytoderm reinforcement. This term codes for the mechanism involved in the accumulation of synthesized phytoalexins on PR proteins and ranking for the induction defense compounds, which include phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), or callose, and phenolic compounds, (Blumwald et al., 1998; Wei et al., 2018).

B. laterosporus can minimize infections by enhancing immunity in plants (Akköprü and Demir, 2005; Chandel et al., 2010). Previously, a protein elicitor PeBL1, having molecular weight of 12.833 kDa, has been identified from B. laterosporus strain A60 (Wang et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2012). But, there are no detailed evidences for strain A60 activating systemic resistance. In this study, we isolated a protein elicitor PeBL2 from B. laterosporus, which can induce systemic immunity against B. cinerea in tobacco plants. PeBL2 can activate systemic resistances as well as an early plant defense-response. The results will definitely help out for elucidating systemic resistance mechanism of B. Laterosporus A60 and also provide a new strategy for plant disease control by PeBL2.

Materials and Methods

Medium and cultures

The Luria-Bertani (LB) medium was used for bacterial B. laterosporus strain A60 and was cultured in 200 ml LB medium at 30°C and 180 rpm for 48 h for protein isolation

Isolation and detection of crude protein

Culture broth was centrifuged and the supernatant was added ammonium sulfate to 62% relative saturation (w/v). The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 20 mins at 4°C and the pellet was collected and dissolved in 100 ml buffer (25 mM MES-NaOH, pH 6.2). It was further dialyzed using same buffer for 48 h for removing ammonium sulphate and harvesting the precipitate. Insoluble debris was removed by centrifuging and crude protein was finally collected by freeze-drying.

Purification of crude protein

ÄKTA Explore system (Amersham Biosciences) was used to purify the crude protein. The crude protein was loaded onto a HisTrap SP-HF column (5 ml; GE-Healthcare). Briefly, washing of column was conducted with Buffer-A for eluting bound proteins and removing traces of any unbound proteins. An increasing linear gradient NaCl (0–1 M) was used to elute the target proteins. Buffer-A was used to monitor the elicitor activity against the tobacco plant leaf in each fraction after dialysis. (Wang et al., 2015) Furthermore, HPLC was conducted for purification of the crude proteins. Positive fractions were separated using a solution of n-butyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol, water, and aqueous ammonia (60:20:20:10). The concentration of ACN (acetonitrile) was raised in the eluted solvent from 10 to 60% (v/v) for 28 min by using increasing linear gradient at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. T3 C18 (Waters Atlantis) reverse phase column was equilibrated (2.1 × 150 mm, 3.5 m, 40°C) with 2 mM NH4FA/0.1% FA/water and 5% ACN and the pooled active fraction were injected onto the column. Through the fraction collector, the sample was collected, coupled with the monitoring of absorbance was carried at 235 nm. To determine the purity, each peak was tested against tobacco plant leaves while the fraction exhibiting elicitor activity was chromatographed.

Mass spectrometry analysis

Using the Triple TOF 5600 TOF MS Analyser (Applied Biosystems), the active segment collected after preparative HPLC was analyzed. MS scanning mode with a scan range of 250–2000 (m/z) was used to acquire data. Samples were digested after lyophilization using 2 μl of a 20% nitrile reconstitution. 1 μl aliquot of dissolved sample was added directly to the illustration point on the target. After allowing the solvent to dry naturally, 0.5 μl of over-saturated CHCA Matrix Solution (solvent for 50% ACNO, 1% TFA) was added to the corresponding target and dried. Nitrogen was blown onto the target sample and then the sample was put into the instrument through the target trough; analysis was completed using a time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometer 5800 MALDI-TOF/TOF, AB SCIEX) To test analysis, the laser source was 355 nm wavelength of Nd: YAG Laser. The acceleration voltage was 2 kV and positive ion mode and automatic data acquisition were used. The first-order mass spectrometry scan range was 800–4000 Da. A signal-to-noise ratio greater than 50 was selected for the two-stage mass spectrometry of mother ions (MS/MS) analysis. Each illustration click was based on the selection of an 8 A mother ion, a two-grade mass spectrometry (MS/MS) cumulative overlay of 2500, time, and a collision energy of 2 kV with CID shut down. Using the NCBI taxonomy database against Brevibacillus laterosporus (40021), a combined (MS+MS/MS) enzyme search was carried out with the following parameters: Trypsin fixed modifications, carbamidomethyl (C); Dynamical modifications, oxidation (Jackson et al., 2005). The mass values were as follows: Monoisotopic Protein Mass, unrestricted peptide; Mass Tolerance, ± 100 ppm fragment; Mass Tolerance, ± 0.4 Da peptide; Charge State, 1+ ax; Missed Cleavages, 1.

Expression in E. coli and purification of the recombinant protein

From the results of de novo sequencing and BLAST searches in the NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.giv/perotein/ERM166658.1) database, a peptide sequence was obtained. The primers (F primer, 5′-TCAACCACATCCTCCGTACAGC-3′ and R primer, 5′-TGCTACGAACCAGAGAAGCCA-3′) were designed for amplifying the gene. The genomic DNA was isolated using the Bacterial DNA Kit D3350-01 (ΩMEGA Biotech). The elicitor-encoding gene was amplified using genomic DNA as a template. The purified fragment was cloned into a pMD18-T simple vector (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China) and then transformed into Trans 1 T1 (Transgene Biotech, Beijing, China) for sequencing. The gene was constructed into the expression vector, pET-28-a, using the BamHI and XhoI restriction sites. The recombinant vector was then transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for protein expression. The recombinant novel protein was induced by the addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (Sigma, USA). The cells were collected by centrifugation and then disrupted by an ultrasonic disruptor to obtain the supernant. The purification of the recombinant protein consisted of three sequential procedures: (1) affinity chromatography with a HisTrap HP affinity column (GE Healthcare), (2) ion exchange chromatography with a Resource Q column (GE Healthcare) and (3) size exclusion chromatography with a Superdex-200 column (GE Healthcare). By separating on SDS-PAGE and staining the polyacrylamide gel with Coomassie Brilliant Blue, the protein purity and molecular weight were determined. Protein molecular markers (Ferments, Hanover, USA) were used to estimate the size of the purified protein.

Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS)

The ROS level in the tobacco leaves was determined by the histological localization of hydrogen peroxide (Thordal-Christensen et al., 1997). In brief, 6-week-old leaves were treated with PeBL2 (5 mM or Tris (negative control)). After 24 h of treatment, the leaves were excised, and the sample was treated with a solution of 330 diamino-benzidine (DAB), NaOH (1 mg/ml with pH of 3.8). The leaves were placed in 95% ethanol after incubation at room temperature for 8 h. Further incubation was carried out at 65°C for 20 min to remove chlorophyll. The samples were observed after subsequently rinsing with 50% ethanol (Chen et al., 2014).

Bioassay for PeBL2-induced disease resistance

The leaves of tobacco plants were infiltrated with 50 μM of PeBL2 and with BSA as control. The nontreated (systemic) leaves were inoculated with B. cinerea mycelial discs at 3rd day after PeBL2 treatment. B. cinerea infection 2 days later, the inoculated N. benthamiana leaves was detached and place into Petri plates with 1.5% agar medium and maintain high humidity. The diameter size was used to measure the severity of disease (Mao et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011).

Inhibition%=No (Size)of lesion on control leaves-No (Size)of lesion on protein treated leavesNo (size)of lesions on control leaves

Database Analysis

MS/MS spectra were searched against database using Mascot v2.2 (Matrix Science).

Results

Protein elicitor (PeBL2) purification

Supernatant from a culture of B. laterosporus A60 strain was used to isolate the elicitor protein. A HisTrap SP FF colum was used to purify the crude extract to produce peak a and peak b (Fig. 1A). And the two peak protein fractions were infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana to check the elicitor activity (Fig. 1B). The results demonstrated that only peak a can induce the hypersensitive response (HR) (Fig. 1B). To further purify the active fraction peak a, an Agilent HPLC by using Zorbax-Eclipse (XDB-C18) was carried out. The results showed that the initial six absorbed fractions (A, B, C, D, E, and F) were obtained (Fig. 2A). All portions were checked for elicitor activity. Only peak D have elicitor activity (Fig. 2B). Under the same conditions this peak underwent chromatography again showed a single peak as in Fig. 3A. Tricine SDS-PAGE display relative molecular mass as 17 kDa (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results demonstrated that a novel protein PeBL2 was obtained.

The induction of the hypersensitive response (HR) by the protein elicitor

HR necrotic zones have been observed at infiltration sites at 24 hpi (Fig. 3C). Whereas, the corresponding protein buffer infiltrated leaves did not show any necrosis. For confirmation PeBL2 concentration for HR in detail, a series of dilutions from recombinant PeBL2 were prepared and infiltrated in tobacco leaves, the results demonstrated 50 μM as the minimal elicitor protein concentration to induce HR.

Amino acid sequence

For the determination of amino acid sequence HPLC was performed for in gel proteins of PeBL2. ESI-MS/MS was carried out and further analysis was performed by de-novo-quenching. A hypothetical conserved protein from the B. laterosporus (GenBank accession no. ERM16658.1), with the proteins sharing 100% identity in the region that the sequence covered. This sequence was used to design PCR primers for cloning gene encoding PeBL2.

Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogeny is a diagram that depicts the lines of evolutionary decent of deferent species, organisms or genes from a common ancestor. A phylogeny analysis was conducted to observe the evolutionary and functional relationship of PeBL2 members in B. laterosporus (Anbu, 2016; Wang et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2012). All downloaded proteins sequences were aligned using MEGA6. From the resultant multiple sequence alignment, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) by a line in module in MEGA6. The reliability for internal branches was assessed using the bootstrapping method (1,000 bootstrap replicates). The final tree revealed the distribution of PeBL2 in five different groups that are also describe in (Fig. 4).

peBL2 gene sequence and heterologous expression

The full-length DNA sequence encoding PeBL2 (GenBank accession no. ERM16658.1) was amplified from the B. laterosporus A60 strain. The length of the PeBL2 gene is 471 bp, encoding a protein with 156 amino acids comprising of theoretical molecular weight as 17.22 kDa. Using online software SignalP 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP-3.0/) it was confirmed that the PeBL2 is a hypothetical protein. The recombinant protein expressed by pET28 (a+) was purified by a HisTrap-HP affinity column, Superdex-200 column and a Resource Q column. A single band with 17 kDa molecular mass was showed on SDS-Page (Fig. 5A–C).

PeBL2 caused ROS accumulation

In order to examine recombinant PeBL2-activated HR biochemical responses, the accumulation of ROS generated by the plasma membrane-localized NADPH oxidase complex was analyzed (Bóka and Orbán, 2007; Rahantaniaina et al., 2017) and levels of H2O2 and superoxide anion (O2) production were assayed using DAB. Significant brown DAB-stained precipitates were easily observed in the recombinant PeBL2-treated areas (Fig. 7A and B).

PeBL2 induced plant Systemic resistance

A 20 μM recombinant PeBL2 was used for the treatment of six-week-old N. benthamiana leaves along with buffer (control). A mechanical inoculation of successive leaves after three days with B. cinerea. A supervised controlled regime of 25°C under a 12 h light/dark was maintained for these inoculated plants for daily disease symptoms observations. The disease severity as recorded through measuring lesion diameters B. cinerea lesions at 3 days post-inoculation 10 random injuries were measured and shown in Fig. 6A. Inhibition rate presented in Fig. 6B1 shown clear differences between treated and BSA (untreated). Fig. 6B which shows significant differences for PeBL2 and BSA treatment.

Discussion

B. laterosporus is gram positive bacteria, which produces protentional protein elicitor but not reported as biological hazard. Moreover, B. laterosporus has also been reported as capable of decomposing characteristics in organisms. Here we have determined that B. laterosporus A60 produce elicitor protein PeBL2 that can induce plant systemic disease resistance in tobacco plant. Elicitor has some special criteria, as well as advantages, that make it a strong candidate as a biological control agent (BCA) (Huang et al., 2005; de Oliveira et al., 2004; Saikia et al., 2011; Song et al., 2011). Furthermore, B. laterosporus can produce different types of compounds, including siderophores and antibiotics (e.g., bacilysin, iturin, mycosubtilin) that are the main reasons for its antagonistic effect. Second, it can quickly establish and demonstrate defence responses in host plants (Tian et al., 2006). And third, B. laterosporus can survive in various environmental stresses, such as UV light and desiccation, which allow for its natural formulation to be used for commercial purposes (Marche et al., 2016), and this is a fundamental principle of biological control agents (Tian et al., 2006). Regarding this aspect, the goal of this research is investigation of elicitor isolation and the exploitation of PeBL2 against devastating fungi. It is fascinating that this bacterium can harvest a short linear peptide sequence (BLAST search of the NCBI database; Accession ERM16658.1). In the PeBL2 protein, 156 amino acids were similar to another sequence (Accession ERM16658.1) The protein only showed minimal similarity to 5 other proteins isolated from different organisms, such as frogs and insects (Accession ERM16658.1). Our findings, including this sequence, specifies that PeBL2 is a novel protein elicitor. When disease resistance is induced by proteins, it is also assumed that the growth of the plant will be improved. For this reason, protein elicitor is considered as a plant health regulator and plant immunity activator (Qiu et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2010). After inoculation of protein PeBL2, a hypersensitive response (HR) was induced in tobacco leave. It is first reported that PeBL2 has the ability to induce HR related transcription of defense genes along with necrosis features of ISR, production of ROS. The initial action in the defence of the plant was the response that led to the resistance of the plant’s later invaders. Many studies suggest that various signaling molecules can be activated by bacterial protein therapy or pathogenic fungal infections. In the case of downstream cellular signaling processes, the production of reactive oxygen species (O2 and H2O2) is an active process and the earliest event during HR (Wang et al., 2016). Central generation of ROS is resulted from the production of the ROS burst enabling plants the detection of attacking pathogens as well as pathogen-derived elicitors called PAMPs (Torres, 2010). Host cell wall strengthening by glycoprotein cross linking resulted in response from stimulation of ROS production. In addition, ROS production interrelates to various molecules viz. WIPK (wound-induced protein kinase), Ca2+, NO, lipids, whereas mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK), by acting as an intracellular and/or intercellular signaling molecule which may also function in defense signaling pathways (Garciabrugger et al., 2006; Srivastava et al., 2009). The redox environment also results in ROS metabolism in the plant, which helps to regulate the function of NPR1. In the case of plant diseases, NPR1 acts as a crucial mediator of systemic responses.

Conclusions

B. laterosporus strain A60 is a novel strain which can secrete the protein elicitor PeBL2. In current study, we first report the methods for the purification, gene cloning and characterization of the newly reported protein elicitor PeBL2. We found that PeBL2 plays an important role in the induction defence-related early events, as well as HR. The induction of this elicitor in N. benthamiana clearly indicate its strong ability as a plant defence activator against pathogens. Considering the damaging effect of chemical pesticides in crop fields and human health, we can strongly suggest that PeBL2 could be very effectively used in biopesticides. Our research not only interprets the molecular mechanism of PeBL2 but also suggests the potential application of the PeBL2 from B. laterosporus strain A60 as a commercial biocontrol agent to ensure sustainable agriculture as well as product security.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0201100).

Figures
Fig. 1. Purification of the PeBL2 protein. (A) Cation exchange chromatography using a HisTrap SP HP column (2.5 cm × 20 cm). The column was washed with buffer A (25 mM MES-NaOH, pH 6.2) to remove any unbound proteins, and the bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of increasing NaCl (0–1 M). Buffer B (25 mM Tris, 200 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) was used to B. Two fractions (peak a and peak b) were produced. (B) Fractions (peak a and peak b) along with BSA (control) included in the test for HR. Out of these fractions peak a showing HR in tobacco leaves. (C) SDS-PAGE of crude proteins.
Fig. 2. Purification of the active fraction. (A) Waters Atlantis T3 C18 reversed-phase column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, 3.5 m, 40°C) was equilibrated with 5% CAN and acetonitrile/2 mM NH4FA/0.1% FA/water. The concentration of ACN in the eluted solvent was raised from 10% (v/v) to 60% (v/v) over 28 min using a linear gradient at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The peaks a, b, c, d, e and f were produced by HPLC. (B) All peaks were checked for HR in tobacco leaves. Out of all peaks peak d displayed an obvious HR.
Fig. 3. Further purification of the active protein with HPLC (A) HPLC was used to further purify fraction D using Zorbax-Eclipse (XDB-C18). (B) After purification, fraction D was checked by Tricine SDS-PAGE to determine the size of the protein, which is shown as about 17 kDa. (C) The HR activation of purified single protein was checked as compared to BSA.
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA sequencing, which was generated using the neighbour-joining method. Relationships of. ERM16658.1. sequence (highlighted in yellow) to other Brevibacillus species are shown. Bar, 1 change per nucleotide position.
Fig. 5. Expression and purification of protein PeBL2 in E. coli. (A) PCR was used to amplify the full-length DNA sequence encoding PeBL2 from the B. laterosporus A60 strain. The length of the PeBL2 gene is 471 bp, which encodes a protein of 156 amino acids with a theoretical molecular weight of 17 kDa. The PeBL2 gene was cloned and then ligated into pET28a. (B) The recombinant protein PeBL2 was expressed and purified. SDS-PAGE of the purified elicitor protein, PeBL2, displaying a single band by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining. (C) The hypersensitive response induced by the recombinant elicitor protein, PeBL2. The response was observed at 24 h post-infiltration. The elicitor treatment (50 μm) and control treatment with BSA are shown.
Fig. 6. ROS burst in tobacco cells after PeBL2 treatment. The brown DAB-stained precipitates represent ROS burst. (A) No ROS generate in tobacco leaves treated with BSA (control). (B) Significant ROS were observed in the recombinant PeBL2-treated areas.
Fig. 7. Induced disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tobacco. (A) Representative phenotypes of disease caused by B. cinerea in PeBL2 and BSA-infiltrated tobacco leaves. The sizes of the lesions caused by B. cinerea in PeBL2-treated leaves were smaller than that in BSA at 36 h post-infiltration. (B) Lesion sizes caused by B. cinerea were measured in leaves with PeBL2 or BSA-treated plants. Data presented in (B) were calculated as follows: Inhibition % = [(No (size) of lesions on control leaves – No (size) of lesions on protein-treated leaves)/No (size) of lesions on control leaves] × 100%. (B1) data of treated and untreated plants were plotted showing inhibition percentage rate. (B2) Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test (Circles), Box Plots for BSA (control) and PEBL2 (treated) representing differences among both treatments indicate significant differences between PeBL2 and BSA treatment.
References
  1. Akköprü A, and Demir S. 2005. Biological control of fusarium wilt in tomato caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici by AMF Glomus intraradices and some rhizobacteria. J Phytopathol 153: 544-550.
    CrossRef
  2. Allen RL, Bittner-Eddy PD, Grenville-Briggs LJ, Meitz JC, Rehmany AP, Rose LE, and Beynon JL. 2004. Hostparasite coevolutionary conflict between Arabidopsis and downy mildew. Science 306: 1957-1960.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Anbu P. 2016. Enhanced production and organic solvent stability of a protease from Brevibacillus laterosporus strain PAP04. Braz J Med Biol Res 49: e5178.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  4. Asai S, Ohta K, and Yoshioka H. 2008. MAPK signaling regulates nitric oxide and NADPH oxidase-dependent oxidative bursts in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 20: 1390-1406.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Blumwald E, Aharon GS, and Lam BC. 1998. Early signal transduction pathways in plant–pathogen interactions. Trends Plant Sci 3: 342-346.
    CrossRef
  6. Bóka K, and Orbán N. 2007. New aspect of H2O2 signaling. Plant Signal Behav 2: 498-500.
    CrossRef
  7. Cct R, Vermeulen JP, Vels A, Himmelbach A, Mascher M, and Niks RE. 2018. Mapping resistance to powdery mildew in barley reveals a large-effect nonhost resistance QTL. Theor Appl Genet 131: 1031-1045.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  8. Chandel S, Allan EJ, and Woodward S. 2010. Biological Control of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici on Tomato by Brevibacillus brevis. J Phytopathol 158: 470-478.
    CrossRef
  9. Chen M, Zhang C, Zi Q, Qiu D, Liu W, and Zeng H. 2014. A novel elicitor identified from Magnaporthe oryzae triggers defense responses in tobacco and rice. Plant Cell Rep 33: 1865-1879.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  10. Cui AL, Hu XX, Gao Y, Jin J, Yi H, Wang XK, Nie TY, Chen Y, He QY, Guo HF, Jiang JD, You XF, and Li ZR. 2018. Synthesis and bioactivity investigation of the individual components of cyclic lipopeptide antibiotics. J Med Chem 61: 1845-1857.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. de Oliveira EJ, Rabinovitch L, Monnerat RG, Passos LK, and Zahner V. 2004. Molecular characterization of Brevibacillus laterosporus and its potential use in biological control. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 6657-6664.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  12. Díez-Navajas AM, Wiedemann-Merdinoglu S, Greif C, and Merdinoglu D. 2008. Nonhost versus host resistance to the grapevine downy mildew, Plasmopara viticola, studied at the tissue level. Phytopathology 98: 776-780.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. Ellis JG, Rafiqi M, Gan P, Chakrabarti A, and Dodds PN. 2009. Recent progress in discovery and functional analysis of effector proteins of fungal and oomycete plant pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12: 399-405.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Garcia-Brugger A, Lamotte O, Vandelle E, Bourque S, Lecourieux D, Poinssot B, Wendehenne D, and Pugin A. 2006. Early signaling events induced by elicitors of plant defenses. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 19: 711-724.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Glazebrook J. 2001. Genes controlling expression of defense responses in Arabidopsis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4: 301-308.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Haas D, and Défago G. 2005. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 307-319.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Hazotte A, Péron O, Gaudin P, Abdelouas A, and Lebeau T. 2018. Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescens and pyoverdine on the phytoextraction of cesium by red clover in soil pots and hydroponics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25: 20680-20690.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Hu Y, Li Y, Hou F, Wan D, Cheng Y, Han Y, Gao Y, Liu J, Guo Y, Xiao S, Wang Y, and Wen YQ. 2018. Ectopic expression of Arabidopsis broad-spectrum resistance gene RPW8.2 improves the resistance to powdery mildew in grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Plant Sci 267: 20-31.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Huang CJ, Tsay JF, Chang SY, Yang HP, Wu WS, and Chen CY. 2012. Dimethyl disulfide is an induced systemic resistance elicitor produced by Bacillus cereus C1L. Pest Manag Sci 68: 1306-1310.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Huang X, Tian B, Niu Q, Yang J, Zhang L, and Zhang K. 2005. An extracellular protease from Brevibacillus laterosporus G4 without parasporal crystals can serve as a pathogenic factor in infection of nematodes. Res Microbiol 156: 719-727.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Islam W, Noman A, Qasim M, and Wang L. 2018. Plant responses to pathogen attack: Small RNAs in focus. Int J Mol Sci 19: E515.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Jackson SN, Wang HY, and Woods AS. 2005. Direct profiling of lipid distribution in brain tissue using MALDI-TOFMS. Anal Chem 77: 4523-4527.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Jain S, Vaishnav A, Kasotia A, Kumari S, Gaur RK, and Choudhary DK. 2013. Bacteria-induced systemic resistance and growth promotion in Glycine max L. Merrill upon challenge inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum. Proc Natl Acad Sci India 83: 561-567.
  24. Jones JDG, and Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323-329.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Kloeppe JW, Rodríguez-Kábana R, Zehnder AW, Murphy JF, Sikora E, and Fernández C. 1999. Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Aust Plant Pathol 28: 21-26.
    CrossRef
  26. Kukawka R, Czerwoniec P, Lewandowski P, Pospieszny H, and Smiglak M. 2018. New ionic liquids based on systemic acquired resistance inducers combined with the phytotoxicity reducing cholinium cation. New J Chem 42: 11984-11990.
    CrossRef
  27. Kulye M, Liu H, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Yang X, and Qiu D. 2012. Hrip1, a novel protein elicitor from necrotrophic fungus, Alternaria tenuissima, elicits cell death, expression of defence-related genes and systemic acquired resistance in tobacco. Plant Cell Environ 35: 2104-2120.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Lai YS, Renna L, Yarema J, Ruberti C, He SY, and Brandizzi F. 2018. Salicylic acid-independent role of NPR1 is required for protection from proteotoxic stress in the plant endoplasmic reticulum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115: E5203-E5212.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Ma L, Zhang HY, Zhou XK, Yang CG, Zheng SC, Duo JL, and Mo MH. 2018. Biological control tobacco bacterial wilt and black shank and root colonization by bio-organic fertilizer containing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa NXHG29. Appl Soil Ecol 129: 136-144.
    CrossRef
  30. Mao J, Liu Q, Yang X, Long C, Zhao M, Zeng H, Liu H, Yuan J, and Qiu D. 2010. Purification and expression of a protein elicitor from Alternaria tenuissima and elicitor-mediated defence responses in tobacco. Ann Appl Biol 156: 411-420.
    CrossRef
  31. Marche MG, Mura ME, and Ruiu L. 2016. Brevibacillus laterosporus inside the insect body: Beneficial resident or pathogenic outsider?. J Invertebr Pathol 137: 58-61.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  32. Nürnberger T. 1999. Signal perception in plant pathogen defense. Cell Mol Life Sci 55: 167-182.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Ongena M, Jourdan E, Adam A, Paquot M, Brans A, Joris B, Arpigny JL, and Thonart P. 2007. Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environ Microbiol 9: 1084-1090.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  34. Pieterse CMJ, and van Loon LC. 1999. Salicylic acid-independent plant defence pathways. Trends Plant Sci 4: 52-58.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Pieterse CMJ, Leon-Reyes A, Van der Ent S, and Van Wees SCM. 2009. Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat Chem Biol 5: 308-316.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  36. Qiu D, Mao J, Yang X, and Zeng H. 2009. Expression of an elicitor-encoding gene from Magnaporthe grisea enhances resistance against blast disease in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Rep 28: 925-933.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Rahantaniaina MS, Li S, Chatel-Innocenti G, Tuzet A, Mhamdi A, Vanacker H, and Noctor G. 2017. Glutathione oxidation in response to intracellular H2O2: key but overlapping roles for dehydroascorbate reductases. Plant Signal Behav 12: e1356531.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  38. Riera N, Wang H, Li Y, Li J, Pelz-Stelinski K, and Wang N. 2018. Induced systemic resistance against citrus canker disease by rhizospheric bacteria. Phytopathology 108: 1038-1045.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Ryu CM, Pare FPW, and Kloepper JW. 2005. Invisible signals from the underground: Bacterial volatiles elicit plant growth promotion and induce systemic resistance. Plant Pathol J 21: 7-12.
    CrossRef
  40. Saikia R, Gogoi DK, Mazumder S, Yadav A, Sarma RK, Bora TC, and Gogoi BK. 2011. Brevibacillus laterosporus strain BPM3, a potential biocontrol agent isolated from a natural hot water spring of Assam, India. Microbiol Res 166: 216-225.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  41. Saitou N, and Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406-425.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Shilina JV, Gushcha MI, Molozhava OS, Litvinov SV, and Dmitriev A. 2018. Erratum to: “Induction of Arabidopsis thaliana resistance to pathogenic bacteria by lipopolysaccharide and salicylic acid. Cytol Genet 52: 322.
    CrossRef
  43. Smolińska U, and Kowalska B. 2018. Biological control of the soil-borne fungal pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum – a review. J Plant Pathol 100: 1-12.
    CrossRef
  44. Song Z, Liu K, Lu C, Yu J, Ju R, and Liu X. 2011. Isolation and characterization of a potential biocontrol Brevibacillus laterosporus. Afr J Microbiol Res 5: 2675-2681.
    CrossRef
  45. Somasundaram V, Basudhar D, Bharadwaj G, No JH, Ridnour LA, Cheng R, Fujita M, Thomas DD, Anderson SK, McVicar DW, and Wink DA. 2018. Molecular mechanisms of nitric oxide in cancer progression, signal transduction and metabolism. Antioxid Redox Signal 30: 1124-1143.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Srivastava N, Gonugunta VK, Puli MR, and Raghavendra AS. 2009. Nitric oxide production occurs downstream of reactive oxygen species in guard cells during stomatal closure induced by chitosan in abaxial epidermis of Pisum sativum. Planta 229: 757-765.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  47. Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, and Collinge DB. 1997. Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley–powdery mildew interaction. Plant J 11: 1187-1194.
    CrossRef
  48. Tian B, Li N, Lian L, Liu J, Yang J, and Zhang KQ. 2006. Cloning, expression and deletion of the cuticle-degrading protease BLG4 from nematophagous bacterium Brevibacillus laterosporus G4. Arch Microbiol 186: 297-305.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Torres MA. 2010. ROS in biotic interactions. Physiol Plant 138: 414-429.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  50. Ueki A, Kaku N, and Ueki K. 2018. Role of anaerobic bacteria in biological soil disinfestation for elimination of soil-borne plant pathogens in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102: 6309-6318.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. van Loon LC, Bakker PA, and Pieterse CM. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36: 453-483.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  52. Wang H, Yang X, Guo L, Zeng H, and Qiu D. 2015. PeBL1, a novel protein elicitor from Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A60, activates defense responses and systemic resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Appl Environ Microbiol 81: 2706-2716.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  53. Wang N, Liu M, Guo L, Yang X, and Qiu D. 2016. A novel protein elicitor (PeBA1) from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NC6 induces systemic resistance in Tobacco. Int J Biol Sci 12: 757-767.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  54. Wei C, Zhu L, Wen J, Yi B, Ma C, Tu J, Shen J, and Fu T. 2018. Morphological, transcriptomics and biochemical characterization of new dwarf mutant of Brassica napus. Plant Sci 270: 97-113.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Wei ZM, Laby RJ, Zumoff CH, Bauer DW, He SY, Collmer A, and Beer SV. 1992. Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Science 257: 85-88.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Wu G, Liu Y, Xu Y, Zhang G, Shen QR, and Zhang R. 2018. Exploring elicitors of the beneficial rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to induce plant systemic resistance and their interactions with plant signaling pathways. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 31: 560-567.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Zhang H, Yu P, Zhao J, Jiang H, Wang H, Zhu Y, Botella MA, Šamaj J, Li C, and Lin J. 2018b. Expression of tomato prosystemin gene in Arabidopsis reveals systemic translocation of its mRNA and confers necrotrophic fungal resistance. New Phytol 217: 799-812.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Zhang W, Yang X, Qiu D, Guo L, Zeng H, Mao J, and Gao Q. 2011. PeaT1-induced systemic acquired resistance in tobacco follows salicylic acid-dependent pathway. Mol Biol Rep 38: 2549-2556.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  59. Zhang Y, Yan X, Guo H, Zhao F, and Huang L. 2018a. A novel protein elicitor BAR11 from Saccharothrix yanglingensis Hhs.015 improves plant resistance to pathogens and interacts with catalases as targets. Front Microbiol 9: 700.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  60. Zhang YH, Yang XF, Liu Q, Qiu DW, Zhang YL, Zeng HM, Yuan JJ, and Mao JJ. 2010. Purification of novel protein elicitor from Botrytis cinerea that induces disease resistance and drought tolerance in plants. Microbiol Res 165: 142-151.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  61. Zhao J, Davis LC, and Verpoorte R. 2005. Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 23: 283-333.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  62. Zhao J, Guo L, Zeng H, Yang X, Yuan J, Shi H, Xiong Y, Chen M, Han L, and Qiu D. 2012. Purification and characterization of a novel antimicrobial peptide from Brevibacillus laterosporus strain A60. Peptides 33: 206-211.
    Pubmed CrossRef


August 2019, 35 (4)
  • DOAJ
  • ORCID