
Synergistic interactions of fungicides have been exploited as one of the approaches to address the adverse effects of fungicides on the environment and the development of resistant strains in a pathogen population. These synergistic mixtures of fungicides can reduce the amounts of individual active ingredients applied in the field without reducing the control efficacy, thereby delaying the development of resistant strains in a pathogen population and also allowing for the use of fungicides in accordance with the legal limits of the active ingredients (Gisi, 1996). Early studies on such synergistic interactions were performed by using combinations of commercialized fungicides. Synergistic interactions among different triazoles with identical modes of action (inhibition of C14 demethylation in sterol biosynthesis) were reported against
Natural products have diverse chemical structures and biological activities exceeding the capabilities of organic synthesis, in addition to showing the good biodegradability potential that is essential for environment-friendly agrochemicals (Tanaka and Omura, 1993). Considering the performance reliability of commercial fungicides, antifungal synergists of natural origin are expected to reduce the amounts of residual fungicides in the fields and mitigate resistance development. In this regard, several recent studies have shown the potential of combined treatment with natural products and commercial fungicides. The natural phenolic agent octylgallate, which targets the oxidative stress-response pathway, enhanced the activities of kresoxim-methyl and fludioxonil on
Sterol demethylation inhibitors (DMIs) targeting sterol P450 14α-demethylase in the fungal sterol biosynthetic pathway cause deficiency of essential sterol constituents in fungal cell membranes (Joseph-Horne and Hollomon, 1997). DMI fungicides, including imidazoles and triazoles, offer several beneficial characteristics as agricultural fungicides, such as a broad antifungal spectrum and systemic distribution in plants, leading to long-lasting protection. These characteristics have resulted in extensive application of DMI fungicides in seed treatments and foliar and ear treatments. As a result, these fungicides showed the highest sales worldwide in 2013 (Kuck, 2007; Oliver and Hewitt, 2014; Ziogas and Malandrakis, 2015). However, their extensive use has resulted in the development of resistant strains and also necessitated higher application rates in the field, which can accelerate the reduction in the disease control efficacy of DMI fungicides (Holb and Schnabel, 2008). To date, most studies assessing the potential of natural products in enhancing the control efficacy of DMI fungicides evaluated the effects of plant extracts on human pathogenic yeasts. Essential oils such as eugenol, thymol, and carvacrol synergistically interacted with fluconazole by inhibiting biofilm formation and creating pores in the cell membrane, thereby increasing the penetration of antifungal agents (Doke et al., 2014; Khan and Ahmad, 2011). Diferuloylmethane (CUR-I), a major component in natural curcumin, enhanced the antifungal activities of azoles against
In this study, we screened microbial culture extract libraries to identify antifungal synergists of the DMI fungicide tebuconazole. The active ingredient responsible for the synergistic effect was identified through chromatographic purification procedures and spectroscopic analyses for structure elucidation. Since the active ingredient (identified to be schizostatin) showed a DMI-specific synergistic effect, we further investigated the effect of schizostatin on the expression of ergosterol biosynthesis genes in
A microbial culture extract library used for screening a synergist of fungicides was prepared from agar cultures of fungi and actinomycetes as follows: The fungal isolate was cultured on five plates (150 × 20 mm) of PDA for 14 to 20 days. The actinomycete strain was cultured on three plates (90 × 15 mm) of tryptic soy agar (BD Biosciences) for 3 to 5 days. After 28ºC incubation, the agar cultures were extracted in methanol with sonication (120 W and 40 kHz). After dryness under reduced pressure at 40°C, the residue obtained from fungi was re-suspended in distilled water (100 ml) and partitioned with same volume of ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate layer was concentrated
Conidial suspension of
The isolation scheme for a synergist of tebuconazole from a culture extract of
For bioassays using crossed strips, 20 μl of 25 μg/ml of tebuconazole and each fraction (corresponding to the extract of 2 ml of culture broth) were loaded on each paper strip (15 mm × 3 mm, no. 2 filter paper; Advactec, Toyo Roshi Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The strips were placed crossed perpendicularly on PDA medium seeded with 105 conidia/ml of
The structure of compound A isolated from a culture extract of
Tomato seeds (
Synergistic interactions between schizostatin produced by
To quantify the synergistic interactions between schizostatin and commercial ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors, fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) values were examined by the checkerboard assay (De Medeiros Barbosa et al., 2016). The checkerboard assay of schizostatin combined with ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitors on
Relative expression-level changes of
The changes of expression level of
Statistical analyses were performed with Statistical Analysis System version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). For assessment of disease controlling efficacy, the least significant differences method for multiple comparisons was performed to determine differences between means. Error bars represent the standard errors of the mean of replicates of each experiment and the small letters on the bars indicate significant differences between treatments at
In order to screen the microbial extracts displaying synergistic effects with tebuconazole, the MIC of tebuconazole for
Among the 4,006 microbial extracts, 62 extracts (17 fungal extracts and 45 actinomycete extracts) showed synergistic effects (Supplementary Table 1). We re-examined the synergistic effects of these 62 microbial extracts by using crossed-paper strip assays with a sub-lethal dose of tebuconazole (0.5 μg per paper strip, 15 mm × 3 mm) and 40 μl of microbial extract (corresponding to the extract of 2 ml of culture broth). The extract of
The Diaion HP-20 column chromatography produced an 80-100% methanol eluate with synergistic effects, which was further chromatographed on C18 resin. The active fraction (80-100% methanol eluate) from C18 column chromatography was subjected to reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system and eluted with a linear gradient mobile phase of 0-100% acetonitrile supplemented with formic acid. The major peak detected at the retention time of 18.5 min showed a synergistic effect in the crossed-paper strip assay. The active peak eluate was collected through a repeated preparative HPLC procedure and lyophilized to white powder (2.5 mg). The purification procedures were repeated to obtain enough white powder (denoted as compound A), which was subjected to spectroscopic analyses.
The ESI-MS data for compound A showed the pseu-domolecular ions at m/z 335 [M + H]+ and 333 [M – H]-, corresponding a molecular weight of 334 Da (Fig. 2). The molecular formula of compound A was deduced to be C20H30O4. The NMR spectroscopic data of compound A are shown in Table 1. The 13C-NMR spectrum of compound A showed 20 carbon signals consisting of two carbonyl (δC 170.8 and 169.3), four quaternary sp2 (δC 148.9, 137.1, 135.2, and 131.5), four methine sp2 (δC 127.3, 124.5, 124.2, and 122.6), six methylene sp2 (δC 39.9, 39.7, 27.9, 27.6, 26.8, and 26.6), and four methyl groups (δC 25.9, 17.8, 16.1, and 16.1). The 1H-NMR spectrum of compound A showed signals for four methine (δH 6.88, 5.18, 5.09, and 5.09), six methylene (δH 2.85, 2.22, 2.05, 2.05, 1.97, 1.97), and four singlet methyl protons (δH 1.67, 1.60, 1.59, 1.59). By comparison with the previously reported NMR data (Kogen et al., 1996), the compound A was identified as schizostatin (Fig. 3).
Table 1 . 13C (125 MHz) and 1H (500 MHz) NMR spectra of compound A in chloroform-
Carbon no. | Compound A | Schizostatina | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
δC, Type | δH, mult. ( | δC, Type | δH, mult. ( | |
1 | 169.3, C | - | 171.0, C | - |
2 | 127.3, CH | 6.88, s | 127.6, CH | 6.90, s |
3 | 148.9, C | - | 149.1, C | - |
4 | 28.1, CH2 | 2.85, t (7.5) | 27.9, CH2 | 2.86, t, 7.5 |
5 | 27.7, CH2 | 2.22, dd (7.4, 14.8) | 27.6, CH2 | 2.23, q, 7.5 |
6 | 122.6, CH | 5.18, t (7.1) | 122.5, CH | 5.19, t |
7 | 137.1, C | - | 137.0, C | - |
7-Me | 16.1, CH3 | 1.60, s | 15.9, CH3 | 1.61, s |
8 | 39.85, CH2 | 1.97, dd (6.0, 13.9) | 39.7, CH2 | 1.98, q, 7.5 |
9 | 26.7, CH2 | 2.05, dd (6.5,13.2) | 26.6, CH2 | 2.06, q, 7.5 |
10 | 124.2, CH | 5.09, m | 124.1, CH | 5.10, t |
11 | 135.2, C | - | 135.1, C | - |
11-Me | 16.1, CH3 | 1.59, s | 16.0, CH3 | 1.59, s |
12 | 39.8, CH2 | 1.97, dd (6.0, 13.9) | 39.7, CH2 | 1.97, q, 7.5 |
13 | 26.9, CH2 | 2.05, dd (6.5, 13.2) | 26.8, CH2 | 2.05, q, 7.5 |
14 | 124.5, CH | 5.09, m | 124.4, CH | 5.09, t |
15 | 131.5, C | - | 131.2, C | - |
15-Me | 17.8, CH3 | 1.59, s | 17.7, CH3 | 1.59, s |
16 | 25.9, CH3 | 1.67, s | 25.7, CH3 | 2.00, s |
17 | 170.8, C | - | 172.3, C | - |
aThe previously reported nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data of schizostatin (Kogen et al., 1996).
To quantify the amount of schizostatin exerting synergistic effects with tebuconazole, we measured the respective FIC indices using broth microdilution assays (Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). The MIC values of tebuconazole and schizostatin against
Table 2 . MICs and FICs of SBIs and schizostatin against
Fungicide | Target site | MIC (μg/ml) | FIC indexa | Interpretationb |
---|---|---|---|---|
Difenoconazole | Sterol C-14 demethylase | 1 | 0.125 | Synergy |
Fenarimol | 8 | 0.1875 | Synergy | |
Fenbuconazole | 1 | 0.0938 | Synergy | |
Imazalil | 1 | 0.375 | Weak synergy | |
Prochloraz | 0.0625 | 0.1875 | Synergy | |
Tebuconazole | 1 | 0.1875 | Synergy | |
Fenpropimorph | Sterol Δ14 reductase and sterol Δ8 → Δ7-isomerase | 4 | 0.375 | Weak synergy |
Fenhexamid | Sterol C3-keto reductase | 0.25 | 2.5 | Indifference |
Schizostatin | Squalene synthase | 4 | - | - |
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; FIC, fractional inhibitory concentration; SBI, ergosterol biosynthesis inhibitor.
aFIC index was calculated as FIC = (MIC of SBI + schizostatin)/(MIC of SBI) + (MIC of schizostatin +SBI)/(MIC of schizostatin).
bFIC ≤ 0.5, synergy; 0.5 < FIC ≤ 1.0, addition; 1.0 ≤ FIC < 4, indifference; FIC ≥ 4, antagonism.
To quantify the synergistic effects of schizostatin and SBIs, we measured the respective FIC indices using the broth microdilution assay (Table 2). The FIC index values for the five DMI fungicides (fenbuconazole, difenoconazole, imazalil, prochloraz, and fenarimol) in combination with schizostatin were 0.0938-0.375, all below the value of 0.5. The FIC index value for fenpropimorph with schizostatin was 0.375 and that for fenhexamid with schizostatin was higher than 1, indicating that there was no interaction between fenhexamid and schizostatin.
The results of assays to determine the synergistic spectrum of purified schizostatin with commercial fungicides showed DMI-specific enhancement. Schizostatin enhanced the antifungal efficacies of ergosterol synthesis inhibitors, especially DMIs. These results suggest that the synergistic interaction may result from targeting different steps in the sterol biosynthetic pathway. Similar to our findings, terbinafine, a non-cytochrome P450 squalene epoxidase inhibitor, enhanced the antifungal activity of azole fungicides by accumulation of intracellular squalene and disruption of the fungal cell membrane (Meletiadis et al., 2003; Perea et al., 2002). The FIC values between terbinafine and azoles ranged from 0.25 to 2 depending on the
The effects of combined tebuconazole and schizostatin treatment were evaluated on tomato leaves infected with
The antifungal activity of schizostatin, previously reported to be a potent squalene synthase inhibitor (Tanimoto et al., 1996), was demonstrated against plant pathogenic fungi by Dutta et al. (Dutta et al., 2019). In that report, schizostatin showed modest antifungal activity against
In order to estimate the molecular mechanisms underlying this synergism, the transcription levels of the ergosterol biosynthetic genes were observed in response to DMIs, schizostatin, and mixtures of both. The transcriptional changes in
We were curious to determine whether this effect of schizostatin supplementation on the increased transcription level of target genes would be observed with the other SBIs. Six SBIs (tebuconazole, fenbuconazole, difenoconazole, prochloraz, fenpropimorph, fenhexamid) were applied onto
In the RNA sequencing analyses,
Citral, a constituent of plant essential oils, has been reported to show antifungal activity against
In conclusion, we found that the fungal metabolite schizostatin had synergistic effects with DMI fungicides against
Supplementary materials are available at The Plant Pathology Journal website (http://www.ppjonline.org/).
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (NRF-2014R1A2A2A01005461).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.