
Lotus (
There are many types of plant viruses, which have a great impact on the yield and quality of crops. The premise of solving virus hazards is to establish a convenient, efficient and fast virus detection system. Serological methods, also known as immunological methods, use the specific binding of an antigen to an antibody to detect a plant virus (Clark and Adams, 1977; Xie et al., 2013). The advantages of this method are mainly high sensitivity, high accuracy, simple operation, and intuitive observation (Boonham et al., 2014). Compared with other detection methods, enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has low cost, good reproducibility, and can process multiple samples at one time, so it is one of the preferred initial detection methods for large sample sizes (Engvall and Perlmann, 1971). The most commonly used methods are ELISA (Boonham et al., 2014; Clark and Adams, 1977), dot immunoassay (Tsai et al., 1989), electrochemical ELISA (Bhimji et al., 2013). In this study, we have detected SPLV-lotus by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (Wang et al., 2019). SPLV-lotus coat protein (CP) was amplified by RT-PCR, cloned and expressed in
Lotus samples showing late germination, early dormancy, declined growth, thin body, deep color, spots, and stripe symptoms were collected from a plantation in Yangzhou city, China (119.4E, 32.4N). Sweat potato samples were collected from Xuzhou city, China (117.3E, 34.2N). Both lotus and sweat potato samples infected by SPLV were confirmed by RT-PCR. The detection primers for lotus are CP-F (5′-GCTGCTGCTGACGATGAACTAGA-3′) and CP-R (5′-CTAATGAATGCCACGCATTCCAA-3′) to detect SPLV-lotus CP coding region (reference sequence: MH705333). The detection primers for sweat potato are SPLV-SP-CP-F (5′-CAGATAAGGGTAAGGAAGT-3′) and SPLV-SP-CP-R (5′-GCATTCCAAGTAGTGTGT-3′) to detect SPLV-sp CP coding region (reference sequence: NC 020896).
The coding sequence for the CP gene was amplified from the cDNA of SPLV-lotus infected lotus plants using CP-F
Purified protein was mixted with equal volume of 2× SDS loading buffer, then heated in boiled water for 10 min. The treated sample was loaded onto a 12.5% SDS-PAGE for electrophoresis. Protein bands were visualised by Coomassie Blue R250 staining. For western blot, the purified samples were separated on 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred to the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The prepared CP antiserum above was taken as the first antibody (diluted 1:5,000) to detect the CP in sample.
For dot blot, liquid nitrogen-freezed fresh leaves were ground to a powder, and the powder was dissolved in 2 equal volumes (m/v) of 0.02 mM PBS buffer (0.02 M NaCl, 0.02 M KH2PO4, 0.02 M Na2HPO4, 0.02 M KCl). The prepared PVDF membrane was wetted with 0.02 M PBST buffer and air dried before loading. Each sample supernatant (5 μl) was spotted in the center of the small square and air dried. The diluted SPLV-lotus CP was used as a positive control, and a healthy lotus sample was used as a negative control. After the completion of a chromogenic reaction, the film was photographed, and the image was used for further quantitative analysis. For the ELISA assay, the ELISA samples were prepared similarly to the dot blot. Results were recorded at OD450 using an ELISA reader (Biotek EL X 800, Winooski, VT, USA).
Image J software was used to quantify the intensity of the reaction color in the PVDF membrane. The independent dot blot films were measured 3 times, respectively, and the final date is the average of the measurement results. The software performed a detailed operation according to the instructions, and the measured value indicated the intensity of the point color that appears. The date obtained from the ELISA reader was exported to Excel software, and the average reading for each sample was obtained based on the position on the plate. The criteria for positive ELISA results could be described as follows: the positive control reading minus the blank reading are above two times of the data that negative control reading minus the blank reading.
We amplified the SPLV-lotus CP gene with primers CP-F
The purified recombinant SPLV-lotus CP was used as an antigen, and the prepared antiserum was used as an antibody for ELISA. The concentration of the CP was diluted to 1 μg/ml, 96-well polystyrene plates were covered overnight at 4°C, the wells were blocked with 1% BSA solution, and then captured with increasing amounts of diluted SPLV-lotus CP antiserum. 0.01% horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG dissolved in 0.02 PBST buffer was used to capture the first antibody. After 10 minutes color reaction at 37°C, a reading was taken at OD450. When the dilution ratio of CP antiserum was 1:64000, the OD450 reading remained higher than 0.6 (Fig. 2A). The ELISA evaluation of CP antiserum indicated that the prepared antiserum was qualified and could be used for the development of serological-based molecular detection methods. To verify the specificity of the prepared polyclonal CP antiserum, purified CP was also used as an antigen for western blot analysis. Purified GST protein was used as a negative control, and purified CP-His was used as a detection target. The specific bands (32 kDa) were clearly visible from the film (Fig. 2). Western blot results further indicated that the prepared polyclonal CP antiserum was qualified and specific for SPLV-lotus CP detection.
To demonstrate the utility of CP antiserum, we first collected 8 fresh lotus samples from Yangzhou city Jiangsu province. Eight lotus samples including health control were ground to powder for western blot detection and RT-PCR detection. Western blot revealed a strip-specific band, and the RT-PCR results were consistent with western blot analysis (Fig. 3). The total volumetric loading of each lane was shown by total protein staining. To achieve high-throughput and rapid detection of wild lotus by the prepared CP antiserum, we also developed dot blot and ELISA methods. We re-collected 12 fresh lotus samples from Yangzhou city. We chose uninfected lotus as a negative control and diluted the protein sample as a positive control. On the dot blot film, the intensity of the spots representing the tissue samples was different (Fig. 4A). These points were quantified by Image J software, and the relative intensities of these points are shown by a bar graph (Fig. 4A). The relative value of the blank was set at 0 and then calculated the relative values of the other samples (Fig. 4A). The same samples were based on the ELISA results, and we plotted the bar graph (Fig. 4B), which was consistent with the results of the above dot blot, indicating that samples 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 11, and 12 were positive samples. The OD405 value of the positive control was higher than that of the negative control, and the difference was significant. RT-PCR showed that detection results were consistent with dot blot analysis and ELISA (Fig. 4C), and all of which were effective for SPLV-lotus detection based on high-throughput, fast CP antiserum methods.
It has been previously reported in the literature that SPLV is serologically related to some potyviruses (Hammond et al., 1992). Therefore, we used SPLV-lotus CP antiserum to detect sweet potato samples. Among the results in eight sweet potato samples, we detected SPLV-sp positive sweet potato samples by RT-PCR No. 1 to 6, while western blot detected only samples No. 2 and 5 (Fig. 5A). It was also found that the SPLV-sp positive sweet potato samples obtained by RT-PCR were not detected by ELISA (Fig. 5B). There was a cross-reaction between SPLV-lotus and SPLV-sp serum, but the reaction was not significant. At the same time, we also used the SPLV-sp ELISA kit (Qiaodu, Shanghai, China) to detect sweet potato and lotus samples. It was found that the SPLV-sp ELISA kit responded strongly to sweet potato samples (Fig. 6A), but the response to the lotus sample was relatively weak (Fig. 6B). Non-specific reaction tests were performed using soybean mosaic virus and turnip mosaic virus with SPLV-sp serum (Supplementary Fig. 1). These clear showed the serum can be used to specific detection of SPLV.
There are only few reports in the literature about the viral diseases in lotus, and the key pathogens that cause the reduction of lotus production have not been found. In this study, we developed high-throughput and sensitive detection methods namely ELISA and dot blot based on specific antibodies. This is the first study in which the serological technique has been used for the identification of SPLV-lotus.
Traditionally, virus-specific antiserum is prepared by immunizing animals with isolated and purified virus particles as antigens, but it is difficult to rule out the effects of host proteins, which often makes the antiserum prepared with low titer and poor specificity. Using prokaryotic expression technology, we can obtain a large number of single proteins encoded by the virus, without low expression of non-structural proteins and poor stability. In this study, the SPLV-lotus CP gene was cloned and expressed by prokaryote, and the recombinant protein was digested and purified. New Zealand white rabbits were immunized to prepare specific polyclonal antibodies. The successful preparation of this antibody can lay the foundation for further research on SPLV-lotus serology detection kit.
Previously, we showed that the nucleotide similarity between SPLV-lotus and sweet potato isolates are around 76% (Wang et al., 2019), which is consistent with the classification criteria of the family
In summary, standard, sensitive and high-throughput assays such as western blot, dot blot and ELISA have been established through the preparation of SPLV-lotus CP antiserum. And we also found that SPLV-lotus antiserum (prepared in this study) cannot be used to detect SPLV isolated in sweet potato samples successfully, and SPLV-sweet potato antiserum (Qiaodu, Shanghai) has weak serological responses to lotus. Our research provides a variety of fast and reliable assays for SPLV-lotus isolates.
Supplementary materials are available at The Plant Pathology Journal website (http://www.ppjonline.org/).
This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFD1000300), Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (2060302), China Agriculture Research System (CARS-24) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31601604).
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.