Outbreak of Rice Blast Disease at Yeoju of Korea in 2020

Article information

Plant Pathol J. 2022;38(1):46-51
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 February 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.08.2021.0130
1Crop Cultivation and Environment Research Division, National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Suwon 16613, Korea
2Yeoju-si Agricultural Technology Center, Yeoju 12653, Korea
*Corresponding author: Phone) +82-31-695-0651, FAX) +82-31-695-0635, E-mail) hg369732@korea.kr

Handling Editor: Junhyun Jeon

Received 2021 August 14; Revised 2021 November 4; Accepted 2021 December 29.

Abstract

Rice blast is the most destructive disease threatening stable rice production in rice-growing areas. Cultivation of disease-resistant rice cultivars is the most effective way to control rice blast disease. However, the rice blast resistance is easy to breakdown within years by blast fungus that continually changes to adapt to new cultivars. Therefore, it is important to continuously monitor the incidence of rice blast disease and race differentiation of rice blast fungus in fields. In 2020, a severe rice blast disease occurred nationwide in Korea. We evaluated the incidence of rice blast disease in Yeoju and compared the weather conditions at the periods of rice blast disease in 2019 and 2020. We investigated the races and avirulence genes of rice blast isolates in Yeoju to identify race diversity and genetic characteristics of the isolates. This study will provide empirical support for rice blast control and the breeding of blastresistant rice cultivars.

Rice is a staple food crop for more than half of the world’s population, and 90% of rice production is cultivated in Asia (Fairhurst and Dobermann, 2002). Rice production accounts for the highest proportion in the agricultural and forestry industry in Korea, and 58% of all farm households cultivate rice (Jeong et al., 2017, 2021). Rice blast disease is one of the most devastating fungal diseases of rice, reducing the annual yields of rice cultivated globally by 10–30% (Fernandez and Orth, 2018; Talbot, 2003). The disease highly occurred in rice fields with the cultivation of susceptible rice cultivars, high inputs of nitrogen fertilizer, and favorable weather conditions (Luo et al., 1998). Under the optimal conditions for occurring the disease, rice blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, causes great damage to rice by infecting leaves, stems, nodes, necks, and panicles through the rice-growing period (Dean et al., 2005).

Research efforts on rice blast disease and breeding of the disease-resistant cultivars have been made to prevent the outbreak of rice blast disease in Korea since the 1960s (Cho et al., 2007; Han, 1995; Han et al., 1994, 2001). In the early 1970s, the Indica and Japonica hybrid rice cultivar, Tongil, was developed with improved grain yield and enhanced disease resistance, and diverse Tongil-type rice cultivars were released nationwide in Korea. However, the proliferation of various genotypic rice cultivars led to the differentiation of rice blast fungus that resulted in the breakdown and loss of blast resistance in Tongil-type rice cultivars (Cho et al., 2007; Chung and Heu, 1991; Han, 1995; Kim, 2018). Since 2000, the outbreak of rice blast disease had gradually declined by the climate changes, the dissemination of cultivation technology with less nitrogen fertilizer, agronomical control such as early rice planting, and the breeding of rice cultivars with improved rice blast resistance. Nevertheless, rice blast disease occurred by the emergence of a new rice blast race and highly increase of the compatible rice blast fungus (Han, 1995; Han et al., 1994, 2001; Lee et al., 2010). Therefore, continuous monitoring of rice blast disease and race diversity are required for disease control during the rice cultivation period.

Race diversity of rice blast fungus in Korea has been investigated using the Korean differential race system to develop disease-resistant rice and prevent the incidence of rice blast. Korean differential race system developed in 1987 comprises Indica-, Tongil-, and Japonica-type rice cultivars and differentiates the rice blast fungus as KJand KI-races according to the patterns of the resistant reactions (Lee et al., 1987). However, it is difficult to understand the genetic characteristics of the rice blast fungus only with the Korean differential race system as there is little research on the genetic background of the Korean differential rice cultivars. Rice blast resistance is explained by the dynamic interaction between a resistance gene of rice and the corresponding avirulence gene of rice blast fungus based on the gene-for-gene theory (Flor, 1971; Silué et al., 1992). The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI)-Japan Collaborative research project developed monogenic lines for rice blast resistance to identify the race of rice blast fungus (Fukuta et al., 2004; Telebanco-Yanoria et al., 2010; Tsunematsu et al., 2000). The monogenic lines contain 24 resistance genes in the genetic background of a susceptible Japonica-type rice cultivar, Lijiangxintuanheigu (LTH). Thus, recent research on race diversity in Korea has been conducted in parallel with the monogenic lines to identify the genetic characteristics of the rice blast fungus. In 2020, rice blast disease severely occurred on the susceptible rice cultivars, Jinsang and Yeonghojinmi, cultivated in more than 68% of the total rice cultivation area in Yeoju. Rice blast continued to progress from leaf to neck and panicles during the rice cultivation period (Supplementary Fig. 1). This study evaluated the incidence of rice blast disease in Yeoju in 2020 and analyzed the meteorological factors and the races of rice blast isolates to determine the causes.

The disease incidence area of rice leaf blast at rice paddy fields in Yeoju was estimated to investigate the incident rate of rice blast. The incidence area of rice leaf blast at 3,285 rice paddy fields corresponding to an area of 1,084 ha was investigated in Yeoju according to the manual of crop diseases and pests monitoring and control established by the Rural Development Administration (2013). Disease incidence level was divided into low (<5%), medium (6–10%), high (11–20%), and severe (>20%) according to diseased leaf area, and the total incidence area was estimated by the following formula:

Incidence area of rice leaf blast (ha)=Incidence area of paddy field (ha)Investigated area of paddy field (ha)×total area of paddy fields (ha)

The disease incidence area of rice leaf blast was 67 ha, 6.2% of the investigated area. When applied to the total rice cultivation area in Yeoju, the disease incidence area was approximately 439 ha corresponding to 1,463 paddy fields (Table 1). The rice paddy fields showing severe and high incidence levels were 32.4% of the total disease incidence area.

Incidence of rice leaf blast at Yeoju in 2020

Rice blast development is intimately related to meteorological factors that include air temperature, accumulated rainfall, and amount of sunshine (Kang et al., 2019; Katsantonis et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Lee and Park, 1979). Meteorological factors including the average air temperature, rainfall, rainy days, and the average amount of sunshine at Yeoju from June to July in 2019 and 2020 were compared with mean values of climate parameters (climatological normals) from 1981 to 2010 to investigate the meteorological factors affecting the incidence of rice leaf blast. The average air temperature, total rainfall, rainy days, and the average amount of sunshine were obtained through daily weather observation data and daily climatological normals data provided by the Rural Development Administration (https://weather.rda.go.kr) and the Meteorological Administration (https://data.kma.go.kr). The average air temperatures of June and July in 2020 were 0.3°C and 4.1°C lower than in 2019, respectively, and 0.3°C and 3.4°C lower than the climatological normals, respectively (Table 2). In 2019, the average air temperature in June was close to the climatological normals but was 0.7°C higher in July. Rainy days were similar in both years, but the accumulated rainfall from June to July in 2020 was 58% higher than in 2019. However, the accumulated rainfall in 2019 and 2020 was 50.4% and 21.6% less than the climatological normals. The average daily sunshine duration of June and July in 2020 was 0.8 h and 1.4 h shorter than in 2019, 0.4 h longer than in June of the climatological normals, and 1 h shorter than in July of the climatological normals. In contrast, the average daily sunshine duration of June and July in 2019 was 1.2 h and 0.4 h longer than the climatological normals, respectively. These results indicate that low air temperature, high rate of total rainfall, and short daily sunshine from June to July in 2020 compared to 2019 would affect the outbreak of the rice leaf blast in Yeoju. Therefore, rice blast disease in Yeoju occurred by the optimal weather conditions as well as the cultivation of the susceptible rice cultivars and excessive fertilization.

Meteorological characteristics in June and July at Yeoju

To investigate the diversity of rice blast fungus in Yeoju, a total of 66 rice blast isolates were collected from the infected leaf samples of Jinsang and Yeonghojinmi (Supplementary Table 1). Single spores were isolated from each lesion of the infected rice leaves. Spores were induced on the infected rice leaves by placing on water agar medium (15 g agar powder in 1 liter) and incubated at room temperature for 24 h. Induced spores were spread on water agar medium using the loop and incubated at room temperature for 24 h. Germinated single spores were isolated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or rice bran agar medium (2 g rice bran, 2 g sucrose, 2 g agar powder in 1 liter) under the microscope and incubated at 26°C. The rice blast isolates were identified as KJand KI-races according to the Korean race differential system. Conidial suspension of the isolates were inoculated on Korean differential rice cultivars. The Korean differential rice cultivars were composed of one Indica-type (Tetep), three Tongil-types (Taebaeg, Tongil, and Yushin), and four Japonica-types (Kanto51, Nongbaeg, Jinheung, and Nakdong) (Supplementary Table 2) (Lee et al., 1987). Conidia were harvested from 10-day-old rice bran agar plates that induce conidia by removing the aerial mycelia and further incubating for three days. A volume of 25 ml of conidia suspension adjusted to 105 conidia per ml containing Tween20 (250 ppm, a final concentration) was sprayed onto 4–5 leaf stage of rice seedlings. Inoculated rice seedlings were moved into the greenhouse after incubating in a dew chamber at 26°C for 24 h under a dark condition. Disease severity was evaluated by scoring from 0 to 5 following the IRRI standard evaluation method at seven days after incubation (Bonman et al. 1986). The isolates were divided into 12 races that were five different KJ-races and seven different KI-races, and the ratio of KJand KI-races in the isolates was 77.3 to 22.7, with KJ-races approximately 3.4 times more than KI-races (Supplementary Table 3). It suggests that KJ-race isolates were much more than KI-race isolates, but the isolates of KI-race were more diverse than those in KJ-race in the fields. Among the isolates, the predominant isolates were KJ-201 (54.5%), KJ-101 (10.6%), KJ-203 (7.6%), and KI-1121 (7.6%) (Fig. 1). The KJ-201 race accounting for more than half of all isolates was first identified in 1981 and had been steadily distributed at a high rate in Korea (Han, 1995; Han et al., 1994).

Fig. 1

KJ and KI race differentiation of the Yeoju isolates. Race diversity of the Yeoju isolates belonging to KJ race and KI race.

The distribution of avirulence genes in 61 isolates was also identified to understand the genetic characteristics of the isolates in Yeoju. We analyzed the resistant reactions of the monogenic resistant lines infected by the isolates. Pathogenicity assay was performed by spraying conidial suspension of the isolates on monogenic resistant lines. The monogenic resistant lines were rice varieties introducing 19 different resistant genes (Pish, Pib, Pit, Pia, Pii, Pi3, Pi5(t), Pik-s, Pik-m, Pi1, Pik-h, Pik, Pik-p, Pi7(t), Pi9(t), Piz-5, Piz-t, Pita-2, and Pi12(t)) based on a susceptible Japonica-type cultivar, LTH (Supplementary Table 4) (Fukuta et al., 2004; Telebanco-Yanoria et al., 2010; Tsunematsu et al., 2000). The monogenic resistant lines introducing Piz-t (100.0%), Pik-h (98.0%), Piz-5 (96.7%), Pi7(t) (95.0%), Pik-p (91.8%), Pik-m (88.5%), Pik (80.3%), Pita-2 (70.5%), Pi9(t) (60.7%), and Pi12(t) (51.7%) showed resistant reactions against more than half of the isolates (Fig. 2). When inoculated the predominant KJ-201 isolates among the isolates, the monogenic resistant lines introducing Piz-t (100.0%), Pik-h (100.0%), Piz-5 (97.1%), Pi7(t) (94.3%), Pik-p (91.4%), Pik-m (91.4%), and Pik (85.7%) showed highly resistant reactions. In addition, we also analyzed the presence and absence of the avirulence genes using the specific molecular markers (Supplementary Table 5). Genomic DNA of the isolates was extracted from mycelia cultivated on PDA. The mycelial block was ground in extraction buffer (1 M KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM EDTA) using a sterilized grind stick. The genomic DNA was extracted following a quick and safe method (Chi et al., 2009) and used for screening of avirulence genes by PCR. More than 70% of the isolates had Avr-Pi9, Avr-Pita1, Avr-Pita2, Avr-Pita3, AvrPiz-t, Avr-Pik, Avr-Pikm, Avr-Pib, PWL2, and ACE1, but none of them had Avr-Pia, Avr-Pii, and Avr1-CO39 (Supplementary Table 6). These results revealed that the isolates mainly have the avirulence genes corresponding to Piz-t, Pik-h, Piz-5, Pi7(t), Pik-p, Pik-m, and Pik and those seven resistance genes would be effective in preventing rice blast in Yeoju. Therefore, introducing Piz-t, Pik-h, Piz-5, Pi7(t), Pik-p, Pik-m, and Pik into rice cultivars would help prevent rice blast disease in Yeoju. These results will provide useful information to control rice blast disease and for the breeding of resistant rice cultivars.

Fig. 2

Reaction of monogenic resistant lines against the Yeoju isolates in 2020. Heatmap of resistant reactions of monogenic lines against the Yeoju isolates.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the project PJ013521022020 of National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at The Plant Pathology Journal website (http://www.ppjonline.org/).

References

Bonman JM, Vergel de Dios TI, Khin MM. 1986;Physiologic specialization of Pyricularia oryzae in the Philippines. Plant Dis 70:767–769.
Chi M-H, Park S-Y, Lee Y-H. 2009;A quick and safe method for fungal DNA extraction. Plant Pathol J 25:108–111.
Cho Y-C, Kwon S-W, Choi I-S, Lee S-K, Jeon J-S, Oh M-K, Roh J-H, Hwang H-G, Yang S-J, Kim Y-G. 2007;Identification of major blast resistance genes in Korean rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.) using molecular markers. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 10:265–276.
Chung GS, Heu MH. 1991. Improvement of Tongil-type rice cultivars from Indica/Japonica hybridization in Korea. Rice: biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 14In : Bajaj YPS, ed. p. 105–112. Springer. Berlin, Germany:
Dean RA, Talbot NJ, Ebbole DJ, Farman ML, Mitchell TK, Orbach MJ, Thon M, Kulkarni R, Xu J-R, Pan H, Read ND, Lee Y-H, Carbone I, Brown D, Oh YY, Donofrio N, Jeong JS, Soanes DM, Djonovic S, Kolomiets E, Rehmeyer C, Li W, Harding M, Kim S, Lebrun M-H, Bohnert H, Coughlan S, Butler J, Calvo S, Ma L-J, Nicol R, Purcell S, Nusbaum C, Galagan JE, Birren BW. 2005;The genome sequence of the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea . Nature 434:980–986.
Fairhurst TH, Dobermann A. 2002;Rice in the global food supply. Better Crops Int 16(Spec Suppl):1–4.
Fernandez J, Orth K. 2018;Rise of a cereal killer: the biology of Magnaporthe oryzae biotrophic growth. Trends Microbiol 26:582–597.
Flor HH. 1971;Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu Rev Phytopathol 9:275–296.
Fukuta Y, Telebanco-Yanoria MJ, Imbe T, Tsunematsu H, Kato H, Ban T, Ebron LA, Hayashi N, Ando I, Khush GS. 2004;Monogenic lines as an international standard differential set for blast resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice Genet Newsl 21:70–72.
Han SS. 1995;Transition of rice blast fungus (Pyricularia grisea) races in relation to differential varieties in Korea. Plant Dis Agric 1:9–17. (in Korean).
Han SS, Ryu JD, Ra DS. 1994;Regional and annual fluctuation of race distribution of rice blast fungus (Pyricularia grisea Sacc.) during 1986–1992 in Korea. Korean J Plant Pathol 10:25–28. (in Korean).
Han S-S, Ryu JD, Shim H-S, Lee S-W, Hong Y-K, Cha K-H. 2001;Breakdown of resistance of rice cultivars by new race KI-1117a and race distribution of rice blast fungus during 1999–2000 in Korea. Res Plant Dis 7:86–92. (in Korean).
Jeong J-M, Kim EC, Venkatanagappa S, Lee J-S. 2017;Review of rice: production, trade, consumption, and future demand in Korea and worldwide. Korean J Crop Sci 62:157–165.
Jeong O-Y, Park H-S, Baek M-K, Kim W-J, Lee G-M, Lee C-M, Bombay M, Ancheta MB, Lee J-H. 2021;Review of rice in Korea: current status, future prospects, and comparisons with rice in other countries. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 24:1–11.
Kang WS, Seo M-C, Hong SJ, Lee KJ, Lee YH. 2019;Outbreak of rice panicle blast in Southern provinces of Korea in 2014. Res Plant Dis 25:196–204. (in Korean).
Katsantonis D, Kadoglidou K, Dramalis C, Puigdollers P. 2017;Rice blast forecasting models and their practical value: a review. Phytopathol Mediterr 56:187–216.
Kim T-H. 2018. Making miracle rice: Tongil and mobilizing a domestic “Green Revolution” in South Korea. Engineering Asia: technology, colonial development, and the cold war order In : Mizuno H, Moore AS, DiMoia J, eds. p. 189–208. Bloomsbury Publishing. London, UK:
Kim Y, Roh J-H, Kim HY. 2018;Early forecasting of rice blast disease using long short-term memory recurrent neural networks. Sustainability 10:34.
Lee E-J, Ryu J-K, Yeh W-H, Han S-S, Lee Y-H. 1987;Proposal of a new method for differentiating pathogenic races of Pyricularia oryzae cavara in Korea. Res Rep RDA (PM&U) 29:206–213. (in Korean).
Lee E-W, Park S-Z. 1979;Interpretation on the epidemic outbreak of rice blast disease in Korea, 1978. J Korean Soc Crop Sci 24:1–10. (in Korean).
Lee YH, Ra D-S, Yeh W-H, Choi H-W, Myung I-S, Lee S-W, Lee Y-H, Han S-S, Shim H-S. 2010;Survey of major disease incidence of rice in Korea during 1999–2008. Res Plant Dis 16:183–190. (in Korean).
Luo Y, Teng PS, Fabellar NG, TeBeest DO. 1998;Risk analysis of yield losses caused by rice leaf blast associated with temperature changes above and below for five Asian countries. Agric Ecosyst Environ 68:197–205.
Rural Development Administration. 2013. Manual of crop diseases and pests monitoring and control Rural Development Administration. Suwon, Korea: p. 221. (in Korean).
Silué D, Notteghem JL, Tharreau D. 1992;Evidence of a gene-for-gene relationship in the Oryza sativa-Magnaporthe grisea pathosystem. Phytopathology 82:577–580.
Talbot NJ. 2003;On the trail of a cereal killer: exploring the biology of Magnaporthe grisea . Annu Rev Microbiol 57:177–202.
Telebanco-Yanoria MJ, Koide Y, Fukuta Y, Imbe T, Kato H, Tsunematsu H, Kobayashi N. 2010;Development of near-isogenic lines of Japonica-type rice variety Lijiangxintuanheigu as differentials for blast resistance. Breed Sci 60:629–638.
Tsunematsu H, Yanoria MJT, Ebron LA, Hayashi N, Ando I, Kato H, Imbe T, Khush GS. 2000;Development of monogenic lines for rice blast resistance. Breed Sci 50:229–234.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

KJ and KI race differentiation of the Yeoju isolates. Race diversity of the Yeoju isolates belonging to KJ race and KI race.

Fig. 2

Reaction of monogenic resistant lines against the Yeoju isolates in 2020. Heatmap of resistant reactions of monogenic lines against the Yeoju isolates.

Table 1

Incidence of rice leaf blast at Yeoju in 2020

Rice cultivation area (ha) Disease incidence area according to disease severitya (ha) Proportion of disease incidence area (%)

Low Medium High Severe Total
7,078 183 114 72 70 439 6.2
a

Disease severity is divided into low (<5%), medium (6–10%), high (11–20%), and severe (>20%) levels.

Table 2

Meteorological characteristics in June and July at Yeoju

Meteorological factors 2019 2020 Climatological normalsa



June July June July June July
Average of air temperature (°C) 21.7 ± 1.7 25.1 ± 1.9 21.4 ± 2.1 21.0 ± 1.8 21.7 ± 0.9 24.4 ± 0.9
Total rainfall (mm) 68.0 188.0 72.0 332.5 146.0 370.2
Rainy days (day) 10.0 16.0 12.0 14.0 17.1 27.4
Average amount of sunshine (h/day) 7.4 ± 4.5 5.0 ± 3.8 6.6 ± 4.1 3.6 ± 3.5 6.3 ± 1.1 4.6 ± 0.6
a

Climatological normals indicate the average of climate parameters from 1981 to 2010.