Methylome Analysis of Two Xanthomonas spp. Using Single-Molecule Real-Time Sequencing

Article information

Plant Pathol J. 2016;32(6):500-507
Publication date (electronic) : 2016 December 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.FT.10.2016.0216
1Department of Systems Biotechnology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
2Department of Integrative Plant Science, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
3Department of Life Science (BK21 Program), Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
*Co-corresponding authors. SC Lee, Phone) +82-2-820-5207, FAX) +82-2-825-5206, E-mail) sclee1972@cau.ac.kr. WJ Sul, Phone) +82-31-670-4707, FAX) +82-31-675-3108, E-mail) sulwj@cau.ac.kr. SW Han, Phone) +82-31-670-3150, FAX) +82-31-670-8845, E-mail) swhan@cau.ac.kr

These authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.

Received 2016 October 12; Revised 2016 October 24; Accepted 2016 October 24.

Abstract

Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing allows identification of methylated DNA bases and methylation patterns/motifs at the genome level. Using SMRT sequencing, diverse bacterial methylomes including those of Helicobacter pylori, Lactobacillus spp., and Escherichia coli have been determined, and previously unreported DNA methylation motifs have been identified. However, the methylomes of Xanthomonas species, which belong to the most important plant pathogenic bacterial genus, have not been documented. Here, we report the methylomes of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10. We identified N6-methyladenine (6mA) and N4-methylcytosine (4mC) modification in both genomes. In addition, we assigned putative DNA methylation motifs including previously unreported methylation motifs via REBASE and MotifMaker, and compared methylation patterns in both species. Although Xag and Xcv belong to the same genus, their methylation patterns were dramatically different. The number of 4mC DNA bases in Xag (66,682) was significantly higher (29 fold) than in Xcv (2,321). In contrast, the number of 6mA DNA bases (4,147) in Xag was comparable to the number in Xcv (5,491). Strikingly, there were no common or shared motifs in the 10 most frequently methylated motifs of both strains, indicating they possess unique species- or strain-specific methylation motifs. Among the 20 most frequent motifs from both strains, for 9 motifs at least 1% of the methylated bases were located in putative promoter regions. Methylome analysis by SMRT sequencing technology is the first step toward understanding the biology and functions of DNA methylation in this genus.

Introduction

The members of the Xanthomonas genus are Gram-negative and motile with a single flagellum, and produce a yellow pigment called xanthan. Xanthomonas species cause serious and devastating diseases in over 400 plants, including economically and agriculturally important crop species such as tomato, pepper, soybean, and rice (Ryan et al., 2011). Among them, Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) is the causal agent of bacterial spot disease on tomato and pepper, and the disease causes serious reductions in yield and quality (Bouzar et al., 1994). This pathogen has been used extensively as a model system to elucidate molecular mechanisms of virulence in plant-microbe interactions (Büttner et al., 2003). In addition to Xcv, X. axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) causes bacterial pustule disease, which is one of the most serious diseases of soybean worldwide. Symptoms are typically characterized by small, yellowish-brown areas with a raised pustule. Xag can cause a severe loss of yield in conditions favorable to the pathogen (Hong et al., 2012).

Methylation of DNA is a process where methyl groups (CH3) are transferred to DNA by DNA methyltransferases, resulting in the production of modified DNA. DNA methyltransferases are present in all domains of life (Razin and Riggs, 1980). In eukaryotic organisms including humans and plants, methylation of cytosine producing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) is mainly found, and is involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression (Laird, 2010). In addition to 5mC, N6-methyladenine (6mA) as well as N4-methylcytosine (4mC) are predominant modifications in bacterial genomes (Sánchez-Romero et al., 2015). The 5mC, 6mA, and 4mC modifications are precisely mediated by DNA methyltransferases recognizing specific motifs in bacterial genomes. These DNA base modifications are known to be involved in a wide range of bacterial processes, such as expression and regulation of genes, regulation of the cell cycle, phase variation, maintenance of genes, and resistance to bacteriophage infection (Haagmans and van der Woude, 2000; Kahramanoglou et al., 2012; Labrie et al., 2010; Low et al., 2001; Skarstad and Katayama, 2013).

To understand the functions of DNA methylation, methylation patterns and motifs in an entire genome (the methylome) have to be determined. The 5mC base modification has been detected by bisulfite DNA sequencing in eukaryotic organisms (Frommer et al., 1992). However, this method is limiting for studying bacterial DNA methylation because it is difficult to detect 6mA and 4mC, which are abundant in bacterial genomes (Casadesús and Low, 2006). A state-of-the-art technique, single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing, has been developed to determine genome sequences as well as to detect modified nucleotides including methylated DNA (Flusberg et al., 2010). SMRT sequencing can identify methylated DNA modifications including 6mA and 4mC in real-time using fluorescent labeled nucleotides and single polymerase molecules (Eid et al., 2009). Using this technique, diverse bacterial methylomes including those of Helicobacter pylori, Lactobacillus spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter coli have been determined, and previously unreported DNA methylation motifs have been identified (Lee et al., 2015; Powers et al., 2013; Zautner et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2016). Plant diseases caused by Xanthomonas spp. are agriculturally and economically important, and the genus has been extensively studied at the molecular and genomic levels as a model system for host-microbe interactions. However, methylome analysis of Xanthomonas spp. has not been reported.

Here, the methylomes of two important Xanthomonas spp., Xag strain 8ra and Xcv strain 85-10, whose genome sequences have been previously reported (accession Nos. AM039952 and JDSU00000000, respectively) (Lee et al., 2014; Thieme et al., 2005), were characterized by SMRT sequencing techniques. We identified 6mA and 4mC modification in the two genomes, and assigned DNA methylation motifs including previously unreported methylation motifs. Comparison of putative DNA methylation motifs from the two species revealed that each strain has a unique DNA methylation system.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial growth and genomic DNA preparation

Xcv strain 85-10 and Xag strain 8ra were grown and maintained at 28°C in tryptic soy medium (tryptic soy broth, soybean-casein digested: 30 g/l). For genomic DNA extraction, Xanthomonas was cultured in XVM2 medium (Wengelnik and Bonas, 1996). The medium contained 20 mM NaCl, 10 mM (NH4)2SO4, 5 mM MgSO4, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.16 mM KH2PO4, 0.32 mM K2HPO4, 0.01 mM FeSO4, 10 mM fructose, 10 mM sucrose, and 0.03% casamino acids (pH 6.7). Bacterial cells grown to OD600 = 0.6 were collected by centrifugation, and washed twice with 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.8). Genomic DNA for SMRT sequencing was then extracted with the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Single-molecule real-time sequencing

Libraries for SMRT sequencing were prepared using 5 μg genomic DNA from each strain. The SMRTbell template libraries were constructed with SMRTbell Template Prep Kit 1.0 (100-259-100; Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For 20 kb libraries, we additionally used the BluePippin DNA Size Selection System to remove smaller fragments of SMRTbell template (< 20 kb). Sequencing primers were annealed to the SMRTbell templates followed by binding with the complex using the DNA/Polymerase Binding kit P6 with the MagBead loading kit (Pacific Biosciences). The SMRTbell library was sequenced using one SMRT cell (Pacific Biosciences) with C4 chemistry (DNA sequencing Reagent 4.0), and 240 min movies were taken for each SMRT cell using the PacBio RS II instrument (Varela-Álvarez et al., 2006).

Bioinformatic analysis of SMRT sequencing data

SMRT sequencing reads of the two different Xanthomonas strains were assembled using the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process (HGAP, version 2.3) workflow developed at Pacific Biosciences (Chin et al., 2013). During this process, assembled contigs were polished with PacBio subreads using Quiver to remove sequencing errors. Finally, contig accuracy was checked by MUM-mer 3.5 (Kurtz et al., 2004) for identifying the bacterial genome and plasmids, with trimming of one of the two similar ends for genome closure. Assembled contigs were structurally and functionally annotated using Prokka, a stand-alone tool specifically developed for bacterial genome annotation (Seemann, 2014).

Genome-wide base modification and analysis were performed using the default settings in the SMRT Analysis 1.1 and the RS_Modification_and_Motif_Analysis 1 protocol (Pacific Biosciences). Briefly, fluorescent signals were quantitated kinetically as part of the SMRT sequencing process. DNA modifications altered the kinetic characteristics of time for base incorporation and measured changes in interpulse duration (IPD). The IPD ratio was calculated by comparing the observed IPD to the in silico IPD control, and a base modification quality value (QV) score was calculated as the Phred transformed P-value of detection at each position in the genome. QV score threshold was set at 30 for genome-wide methylation pattern analysis. Motif identification was performed using MotifMaker (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/MotifMaker) and in-house Python scripts with REBASE version 608 (ftp://ftp.neb.com/pub/rebase/allenz.txt). Identifying where the methylation motifs were located, we developed in-house Python scripts which concatenate open reading frames (ORFs) for predicting hypothetical operon and predicted promoter regions using PePPER (de Jong et al., 2012). Subsequently, Python scripts found the position of the methylation motifs, and calculated the methylation ratio for the promoter, gene body and intergenic regions.

Nucleotide sequence accession number

All sequence data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Accession numbers of Xag strain 8ra are CP017188 and CP017189 for the chromosome and for the plasmid pXAG_1, respectively, and accession numbers of Xcv strain 85-10 are CP017190, CP017191, CP017192, and CP017193 for the chromosome and for the plasmids pXCV_1, pXCV_2, and pXCV_3, respectively (Table 1).

Genome and methylation information in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10

Results and Discussion

Through SMRT sequencing, DNA modifications of the Xag strain 8ra genome were analyzed and the positions of modified DNA bases (4mC and 6mA) were determined. Totals of 66,682 and 4,147 modified bases showing a QV score of over 30 were detected as 4mC and 6mA, respectively, in Xag (Table 1). Interestingly, most methylated bases were found in the chromosome rather than in plasmids. Among the total numbers of 6mA and 4mC methylated bases, 6mA methylated bases were not detected and two of the 4mC methylated bases were observed in the native plasmid (Table 1). In support of this observation, the native plasmids of Xag did not contain any putative DNA methyltransferase (Kim et al., 2006). This may be one reason that very few methylated bases were detected in the plasmid. Alternatively, it is possible that Xag strain 8ra has recently adopted the native plasmid.

Next, we identified putative methylation motifs by using the REBASE database (Roberts et al., 2010) and MotifMaker (PacBio). The modified bases with flanking regions (20 bp length) to either side were used for identifying putative motifs. Fifty-three putative motifs showing at least 50 methylated bases for each motif were predicted in the Xag genome (Supplementary Table 1). The ten most prevalent methylated motifs are shown in Table 2. Among the top 10 motifs, three motifs were known as sequences recognized by specific restriction enzymes (NotI, FnuDII, and MwoI) in other species, but seven motifs were putative new methylation motifs, indicating Xag may possess novel methyltransferases compared with previously known DNA methylation systems. Although the numbers of 4mC methylated bases were significantly higher (16-fold) than that of 6mA, six and four motifs corresponded to 4mC and 6mA, respectively, in the top 10 motifs. Among these motifs, two motifs showed that over 50% of the sites were methylated, and both were 6mA methylation. CAGNNNNNNNNTCTY was the most highly methylated motif (80.42%) under the growth conditions used here.

Top 10 methylation motifs detected for Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines strain 8ra

DNA modifications of the Xcv strain 85-10 genome were also characterized by the same methods used for Xag. In the case of Xcv, 2,321 4mC methylated bases and 5,491 6mA methylated bases were identified with a QV score of over 30 (Table 1). In contrast to Xag, where the majority of methylated DNA modifications were identified as 4mC, in Xcv the number of 6mA methylated bases was over 2-fold higher than that of 4mC methylated bases. Interestingly, the total number of methylated bases detected in Xcv was considerably lower than in Xag. Although both strains belong to the Xanthomonas genus, it is clear that their methylation patterns are dramatically different and it may be that their methylation systems have recently diverged or evolved after speciation. Similar to methylation patterns in Xag, most methylated DNA bases were found in the chromosome of Xcv rather than in the plasmid. Among 2,321 4mC methylated bases, 2,233 and 88 were located in the chromosome and native plasmids, respectively. In the case of 6mA, 5,135 were detected in the chromosome and 356 in native plasmids (Table 1). This means that the native plasmids of Xcv possess significantly higher numbers of methylated bases compared to those of Xag, which had only two detected methylated DNA bases in the plasmid. Xcv native plasmids are reported to contain three putative DNA methyltransferases (Thieme et al., 2005). These are likely responsible for the different methylation patterns in native plasmids between the two bacteria.

To identify putative methylation motifs in Xcv, the methods used for Xag were employed. Xcv possessed 50 possible methylation motifs, each showing over 50 detected methylation modifications (Supplementary Table 2). Among the top 10 methylation motifs in Xcv (Table 3), three were likely new motifs. Interestingly, except for two motifs (CCCGGG and CCNNGG), eight were identified as 6mA. Among the five known motifs (Table 3), CCCGGG is recognized by SmaI restriction enzyme. Yu and Yang (2007) reported that Xcv strain 7-1 has M.XveII, which is a DNA methyltransferase that specifically methylates the second cytosine residue in CCCGGG. Xcv strain 85-10 also contains a homolog of M.XveII, XCV1110 (Thieme et al., 2005). Because XCV1110 is identical with M.XveII at the amino acid level, methylation of CCCGGG in Xcv strain 85-10 is likely to be catalyzed by XCV1110. Unlike Xag, six putative methylation motifs in Xcv were highly methylated (over 80%) under the given conditions. Except for these six motifs, all other putative motifs described in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2 showed below 4% of methylated bases in each motif.

Top 10 methylation motifs detected for Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strain 85-10

Next, we compared the top 10 methylation motifs from Xag and Xcv. Although Xag and Xcv belong to the genus Xanthomonas, methylation motifs of Xag were dramatically different from those of Xcv. There were no common or shared motifs in the top 10 methylation motifs of each strain (Table 2, 3). The top 10 methylation motifs in Xag were detected in the Xcv genome, but the percentages of motifs bearing methylated residues in Xcv were at almost undetectable levels compared to those in Xag (Fig. 1A). Likewise, the top 10 methylation motifs of Xcv were also found in Xag, but the proportion of their methylation in Xag was considerably lower than in Xcv (Fig. 1B). Although the top 10 methylation motifs from each strain were detected in both Xag and Xcv, there was no meaningful correlation of methylation patterns and motifs between the two Xanthomonas spp. under the given conditions. These results suggest that they possess species-specific DNA methylation systems. Species-specific DNA methyltransferases in each bacterium may have been adopted after speciation of the genus Xanthomonas during evolution.

Fig. 1

Comparison of the top 10 putative DNA methylation motifs in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10. Each bar indicates percentage values, which are numbers of methylated motifs divided by numbers of detected motifs in each genome including the chromosome and plasmids. (A) Percentages of the top 10 methylated motifs identified in Xag (red). (B) Percentages of the top 10 methylated motifs identified in Xcv (blue).

We further investigated the distribution of the top 10 methylation motifs at the genome level (Fig. 2). The genomes of both strains were divided into three regions: putative promoters predicted by the PePPER program, gene bodies (open reading frames and operon regions), and intergenic regions, defined as any region in the genome excluding putative promoter and gene body regions. Among 10 motifs in Xag, six motifs were mainly distributed in gene bodies and intergenic regions (Fig. 2A). Four motifs—CAGNNNNNNNNTCTY, RAGANNNNNNNNCTG, GAACAC, and BNAKGYAVYA—showed that at least 1% of methylated bases were located in putative promoter regions. Methylation of these four motifs may be involved in regulation of gene expression. The Dam site (GATC), which is widely distributed in the entire E. coli genome, plays a role in regulating phase variation. The methylation status of a Dam sites upstream from the pap operon is critical for the binding of Lrp regulator and expression of the pap operon (Nou et al., 1993). Likewise, over 1% of methylated bases of five motifs (AAGNNNNNNCTC, GAGNNNNNNCTT, TACGAG, RGACNNNNNGGT, and GAAGAC) in Xcv were detected in putative promoter regions (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, base modification of all nine promoter-associated motifs from both Xag and Xcv was 6mA but not 4mC. In addition to Dam methylation, CcrM (GANTC) methylation is known to be associated with regulation of gene expression in bacteria (Low et al., 2001). Both Dam and CcrM methylation are 6mA base modifications. Therefore, nine motifs that were detected in putative promoter regions and involved 6mA base modification are possibly related to gene regulation control in Xanthomonas spp. Although distribution of putative DNA methylation motifs was presented in this study, roles of methylation in gene body are difficult to speculate. Genome-wide distribution and patterns of methylated motifs have recently been determined by SMRT sequencing and roles of methylation in gene body are not well-documented at genome levels in other bacteria. Subsequent studies will be required for elucidating functions of individual DNA methyltransferases and their motifs at genome-wide levels in Xcv and Xag.

Fig. 2

Distribution of the top 10 methylated motif sites in promoter regions, gene body, and intergenic regions in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra (A) and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10 (B). Promoter regions (dark blue) are predicted by PePPER (prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons). Gene body (medium blue) includes open reading frames and operons. Intergenic regions (light blue) are defined as any region in the genome excluding putative promoter regions and gene bodies.

The bacterial strains used for methylome analysis in this study were cultured in XVM2 media where Xanthomonas spp. could express diverse virulence-related genes and secrete major virulence factors for infection (Wengelnik and Bonas, 1996). However, as mentioned above, the methylation patterns of Xag and Xcv were dramatically different. They may possess different virulence factors and their responses to identical conditions are likely different because their host ranges are clearly distinct and they have specialized life cycles. Xag infects soybean but cannot infect tomato and pepper, and Xcv causes severe disease in tomato and pepper but not soybean. These differences may have an influence on the distinct methylation patterns observed in identical media and incubation conditions, because regulation of gene expression in phase variation and virulence by DNA methylation is well established (Camacho and Casadesús, 2002; Casadesús and Low, 2006; Marinus and Casadesus, 2009; Sánchez-Romero et al., 2015). In addition, DNA methylation is one of the known antiviral mechanisms of bacteria (Labrie et al., 2010). Within the same bacterial species, different strains show distinct resistant patterns against infection of diverse bacteriophages (Chae et al., 2014). Host ranges of bacteriophages are most likely determined by specific DNA methyltransferases in bacteria. Therefore, it can be easily speculated that Xag and Xcv possess different resistant ranges against bacteriophage infection and the dramatically different methylation patterns in two Xanthomonas spp. may be one of ways to explain species- or strain-specific antiviral responses against phage infection. The results presented in here can provide knowledge relevant to bacterial resistance against bacteriophage infection.

In this study, we analyzed and compared the 6mA and 4mC methylomes of two Xanthomonas spp. using SMRT sequencing techniques. We demonstrated preliminary DNA methylation patterns that further showed possible species-specific methylation motifs. The epigenetic regulation of gene expression in Xanthomonas spp. is little studied. The employment of SMRT sequencing techniques has led to new insight into understanding the biology and functions of DNA methylation in this genus. Genome analysis of both Xag and Xcv strains revealed that they contain 15 and 10 putative DNA methyltransferases, respectively (Lee et al., 2014; Thieme et al., 2005), and there is no significant homology except XAR_0064 (Supplementary Table 3). Although we show putative methylation motifs of Xag and Xcv in this study, we still do not understand the functions of specific DNA methyltransferases including their recognition sites in both species. To figure out their functions and importance at genome levels, the roles of individual DNA methyltransferases are under investigation by combination of SMRT sequencing techniques and biochemical/phenotypical analysis.

Supplementary materials

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Research Foundation (NRF-2015R1A2A2A01004242) and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ01103 301) of the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. This research was supported by the Chung-Ang University Graduate Research Scholarship in 2016.

Notes

Articles can be freely viewed online at www.ppjonline.org.

References

Bouzar H, Jones JB, Stall RE, Hodge NC, Minsavage GV, Benedict AA, Alvarez AM. 1994;Physiological, chemical, serological, and pathogenic analyses of a worldwide collection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. Phytopathology 84:663–671. 10.1094/Phyto-84-663.
Büttner D, Noël L, Thieme F, Bonas U. 2003;Genomic approaches in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria allow fishing for virulence genes. J Biotechnol 106:203–214. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.07.012. 14651862.
Camacho EM, Casadesús J. 2002;Conjugal transfer of the virulence plasmid of Salmonella enterica is regulated by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA adenine methylation. Mol Microbiol 44:1589–1598. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02981.x. 12067346.
Casadesús J, Low D. 2006;Epigenetic gene regulation in the bacterial world. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:830–856. 10.1128/MMBR.00016-06. 16959970. 1594586.
Chae JC, Hung NB, Yu SM, Lee HK, Lee YH. 2014;Diversity of bacteriophages infecting Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in paddy fields and its potential to control bacterial leaf blight of rice. J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:740–747. 10.4014/jmb.1402.02013. 24651644.
Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J. 2013;Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10:563–569. 10.1038/nmeth.2474. 23644548.
de Jong A, Pietersma H, Cordes M, Kuipers OP, Kok J. 2012;PePPER: a webserver for prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons. BMC Genomics 13:299. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-299. 22747501. 3472324.
Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J, Otto G, Peluso P, Rank D, Baybayan P, Bettman B, Bibillo A, Bjornson K, Chaudhuri B, Christians F, Cicero R, Clark S, Dalal R, Dewinter A, Dixon J, Foquet M, Gaertner A, Hardenbol P, Heiner C, Hester K, Holden D, Kearns G, Kong X, Kuse R, Lacroix Y, Lin S, Lundquist P, Ma C, Marks P, Maxham M, Murphy D, Park I, Pham T, Phillips M, Roy J, Sebra R, Shen G, Sorenson J, Tomaney A, Travers K, Trulson M, Vieceli J, Wegener J, Wu D, Yang A, Zaccarin D, Zhao P, Zhongm F, Korlachm J, Turner S. 2009;Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323:133–138. 10.1126/science.1162986.
Flusberg BA, Webster DR, Lee JH, Travers KJ, Olivares EC, Clark TA, Korlach J, Turner SW. 2010;Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 7:461–465. 10.1038/nmeth.1459. 20453866. 2879396.
Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, Collis CM, Watt F, Grigg GW, Molloy PL, Paul CL. 1992;A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:1827–1831. 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1827. 1542678. 48546.
Haagmans W, van der Woude M. 2000;Phase variation of Ag43 in Escherichia coli: Dam-dependent methylation abrogates OxyR binding and OxyR-mediated repression of transcription. Mol Microbiol 35:877–887. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01762.x. 10692164.
Hong JK, Sung CH, Kim DK, Yun HT, Jung W, Kim KD. 2012;Differential effect of delayed planting on soybean cultivars varying in susceptibility to bacterial pustule and wildfire in Korea. Crop Prot 42:244–249. 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.07.014.
Kahramanoglou C, Prieto AI, Khedkar S, Haase B, Gupta A, Benes V, Fraser GM, Luscombe NM, Seshasayee AS. 2012;Genomics of DNA cytosine methylation in Escherichia coli reveals its role in stationary phase transcription. Nat Commun 3:886. 10.1038/ncomms1878. 22673913.
Kim JG, Choi S, Oh J, Moon JS, Hwang I. 2006;Comparative analysis of three indigenous plasmids from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines. Plasmid 56:79–87. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.03.001. 16697042.
Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004;Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol 5:R12. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-2-r12. 14759262. 395750.
Labrie SJ, Samson JE, Moineau S. 2010;Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:317–327. 10.1038/nrmicro2315. 20348932.
Laird PW. 2010;Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nat Rev Genet 11:191–203. 10.1038/nrg2732. 20125086.
Lee JH, Shin H, Park HJ, Ryu S, Han SW. 2014;Draft genome sequence of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines 8ra possessing transcription activator-like effectors used for genetic engineering. J Biotechnol 179:15–16. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.03.009. 24657734.
Lee WC, Anton BP, Wang S, Baybayan P, Singh S, Ashby M, Chua EG, Tay CY, Thirriot F, Loke MF, Goh KL, Marshall BJ, Roberts RJ, Vadivelu J. 2015;The complete methylome of Helicobacter pylori UM032. BMC Genomics 16:424. 10.1186/s12864-015-1585-2. 26031894. 4450513.
Low DA, Weyand NJ, Mahan MJ. 2001;Roles of DNA adenine methylation in regulating bacterial gene expression and virulence. Infect Immun 69:7197–7204. 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7197-7204.2001. 11705888. 98802.
Marinus MG, Casadesus J. 2009;Roles of DNA adenine methylation in host-pathogen interactions: mismatch repair, transcriptional regulation, and more. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:488–503. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00159.x. 19175412. 2941194.
Nou X, Skinner B, Braaten B, Blyn L, Hirsch D, Low D. 1993;Regulation of pyelonephritis-associated pili phase-variation in Escherichia coli: binding of the Papl and the Lrp regulatory proteins is controlled by DNA methylation. Mol Microbiol 7:545–553. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01145.x. 8096319.
Powers JG, Weigman VJ, Shu J, Pufky JM, Cox D, Hurban P. 2013;Efficient and accurate whole genome assembly and methylome profiling of E. coli. BMC Genomics 14:675. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-675. 24090403. 4046830.
Razin A, Riggs AD. 1980;DNA methylation and gene function. Science 210:604–610. 10.1126/science.6254144. 6254144.
Roberts RJ, Vincze T, Posfai J, Macelis D. 2010;REBASE--a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D234–D236. 10.1093/nar/gkp874.
Ryan RP, Vorhölter FJ, Potnis N, Jones JB, Van Sluys MA, Bogdanove AJ, Dow JM. 2011;Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacterium-plant interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:344–355. 10.1038/nrmicro2558. 21478901.
Sánchez-Romero MA, Cota I, Casadesús J. 2015;DNA methylation in bacteria: from the methyl group to the methylome. Curr Opin Microbiol 25:9–16. 10.1016/j.mib.2015.03.004. 25818841.
Seemann T. 2014;Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. 24642063.
Skarstad K, Katayama T. 2013;Regulating DNA replication in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a012922. 10.1101/cshperspect.a012922. 23471435. 3683904.
Thieme F, Koebnik R, Bekel T, Berger C, Boch J, Büttner D, Caldana C, Gaigalat L, Goesmann A, Kay S, Kirchner O, Lanz C, Linke B, McHardy AC, Meyer F, Mittenhuber G, Nies DH, Niesbach-Klösgen U, Patschkowski T, Rückert C, Rupp O, Schneiker S, Schuster SC, Vorhölter FJ, Weber E, Pühler A, Bonas U, Bartels D, Kaiser O. 2005;Insights into genome plasticity and pathogenicity of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria revealed by the complete genome sequence. J Bacteriol 187:7254–7266. 10.1128/JB.187.21.7254-7266.2005. 16237009. 1272972.
Varela-Álvarez E, Andreakis N, Lago-Lestón A, Pearson GA, Serrão EA, Procaccini G, Duarte CM, Marbá M. 2006;Genomic DNA isolation from green and brown algae (caulerpales and fucales) for microsatellite library construction. J Phycol 42:741–745. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00218.x.
Wengelnik K, Bonas U. 1996;HrpXv, an AraC-type regulator, activates expression of five of the six loci in the hrp cluster of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J Bacteriol 178:3462–3469. 10.1128/jb.178.12.3462-3469.1996. 8655542. 178114.
Yu YJ, Yang MT. 2007;A novel restriction-modification system from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria encodes a m4C-methyltransferase and a nonfunctional restriction endonuclease. FEMS Microbiol Lett 272:83–90. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00738.x. 17488332.
Zautner AE, Goldschmidt AM, Thürmer A, Schuldes J, Bader O, Lugert R, Groß U, Stingl K, Salinas G, Lingner T. 2015;SMRT sequencing of the Campylobacter coli BfR-CA-9557 genome sequence reveals unique methylation motifs. BMC Genomics 16:1088. 10.1186/s12864-015-2317-3. 26689587. 4687069.
Zhang W, Sun Z, Menghe B, Zhang H. 2015;Short communication: Single molecule, real-time sequencing technology revealed species- and strain-specific methylation patterns of 2 Lactobacillus strains. J Dairy Sci 98:3020–3024. 10.3168/jds.2014-9272. 25747834.
Zhu L, Zhong J, Jia X, Liu G, Kang Y, Dong M, Zhang X, Li Q, Yue L, Li C, Fu J, Xiao J, Yan J, Zhang B, Lei M, Chen S, Lv L, Zhu B, Huang H, Chen F. 2016;Precision methylome characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) using PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) technology. Nucleic Acids Res 44:730–743. 10.1093/nar/gkv1498. 4737169.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Comparison of the top 10 putative DNA methylation motifs in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10. Each bar indicates percentage values, which are numbers of methylated motifs divided by numbers of detected motifs in each genome including the chromosome and plasmids. (A) Percentages of the top 10 methylated motifs identified in Xag (red). (B) Percentages of the top 10 methylated motifs identified in Xcv (blue).

Fig. 2

Distribution of the top 10 methylated motif sites in promoter regions, gene body, and intergenic regions in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra (A) and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10 (B). Promoter regions (dark blue) are predicted by PePPER (prediction of prokaryote promoter elements and regulons). Gene body (medium blue) includes open reading frames and operons. Intergenic regions (light blue) are defined as any region in the genome excluding putative promoter regions and gene bodies.

Table 1

Genome and methylation information in Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag) strain 8ra and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) strain 85-10

Alias (accession No.) Length (bp) GC ratio (%) No. of 6mA detected % of 6mA* No. of 4mC detected % of 4mC
Xag 8ra Chromosome (CP017188) 5,363,581  64.6 4,147 0.44 66,680 3.85
pXAG_1 (CP017189) 26,610  61.4 0 0 2 0.02
Xcv 85-10 Chromosome (CP017190) 5,178,450  64.7 5,135 0.56 2,233 0.13
pXCV_1 (CP017191) 182,571  60.5 62 0.17 5 0.00
pXCV_2 (CP017192) 38,116  60.7 282 3.84 81 0.71
pXCV_3 (CP017193) 19,146  59.8 12 0.32 2 0.04

6mA, N6-methyladenine; 4mC, N4-methylcytosine.

*

Numbers of methylated adenines were compared with numbers of total adenines.

Numbers of methylated cytosines were compared with numbers of total cytosines.

Table 2

Top 10 methylation motifs detected for Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines strain 8ra

Motif Type of modification No. of methylation detected No. of motifs detected % of methylation detected Restriction enzyme Origin
CAGNNNNNNNNTCTY 6mA 1,023 1,272 80.42 New New
RAGANNNNNNNNCTG 6mA 850 1,272 66.82 New New
GAACAC 6mA 1,663 3,506 47.43 New New
GCGGCCGC* 4mC 442 1,860 23.76 NotI Nocardia otitidis-caviarum
GCSSYABTG 4mC 496 3,321 14.94 New New
CGCG 4mC 18,048 162,810 11.09 FnuDII Brevibacterium epidermidis
BNAKGYAVYA 6mA 134 1,780 7.53 New New
GCNNNNNNNGC 4mC 13,639 214,192 6.37 MwoI Methanobacterium wolfei
CNSBVNYH 4mC 24,611 459,291 5.36 New New
CMGCKG 4mC 1,651 361,420 4.57 New New

Bolds indicate methylated bases.

6mA, N6-methyladenine; 4mC, N4-methylcytosine.

*

Numbers of motifs methylated on the first, third, or fourth position of cytosines.

Numbers of motifs methylated on the first or second position of cytosines.

Table 3

Top 10 methylation motifs detected for Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strain 85-10

Motif Type of modification No. of methylation detected No. of motifs detected % of methylation detected Restriction enzyme Origin
AAGNNNNNNCTC 6mA 1,153 1,156 99.74 Hpy99XVII Helicobacter pylori J99
ACCNNNNNGTCY 6mA 1,117 1,126 99.20 New New
GAGNNNNNNCTT 6mA 1,143 1,156 98.88 Hpy99XVII H. pylori J99
TACGAG 6mA 971 983 98.78 New New
RGACNNNNNGGT 6mA 1,113 1,127 98.76 New New
CCCGGG 4mC 2,241 2,722 82.33 SmaI Citrobacter freundii
CCNNGG 4mC 2,241 63,872 3.51 BsaJI Bacillus stearothermophilus J695
CGAAGAC 6mA 53 1,573 3.37 SstE37I Sagittula stellata E-37
GAAGAC 6mA 92 3,276 2.81 BbvII Bacillus species IS4
GAGTC 6mA 65 3,093 2.10 PleI Micrococcus lylae

Bolds indicate methylated bases.

6mA, N6-methyladenine; 4mC, N4-methylcytosine.