First Isolation and Molecular Characterization of Bacteriophages Infecting Acidovorax citrulli, the Causal Agent of Bacterial Fruit Blotch

Article information

Plant Pathol J. 2018;34(1):59-64
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 February 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.NT.08.2017.0190
1Department of Microbiology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Korea
2Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea
3Biological Resources Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Jeongeup 56212, Korea
4Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Gimhae College, Gimhae 50811, Korea
*Corresponding author. Phone) +82-51-620-6367, FAX) +82-51-611-6358, E-mail) choitj@pknu.ac.kr

Handling Associate Editor : Oh, Chang-Sik

Received 2017 August 29; Revised 2017 October 26; Accepted 2017 November 02.

Abstract

Bacteriophages of Acidovorax citrulli, the causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch, were isolated from 39 watermelon, pumpkin, and cucumber leaf samples collected from various regions of Korea and tested against 18 A. citrulli strains. Among the six phages isolated, ACP17 forms the largest plaque, and exhibits the morphology of phages in the Myoviridae family with a head diameter of 100 ± 5 nm and tail length of 150 ± 5 nm. ACP17 has eclipse and latent periods of 25 ± 5 min and 50 ± 5 min, respectively, and a burst size of 120. The genome of ACP17 is 156,281 base pairs with a G + C content of 58.7%, 263 open reading frames, and 4 transfer RNA genes. Blast search and phylogenetic analysis of the major capsid protein showed that ACP17 has limited homology to two Stentrophomonas phages, suggesting that ACP17 is a new type of Myoviridae isolated from A. citrulli.

Keywords: BFB; phage; watermelon

Bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) is a bacterial disease of many Cucurbitaceae family members caused by Acidovorax citrulli (Schaad et al., 2008) [formerly Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli (Willems et al., 1992)]. After large economic losses in southwestern Indiana, USA, in the 1980s (Latin and Fane, 1990), this disease became a major economic threat to watermelon, melon, and cucumber crops in South America, Australia, and Asia (Isakeit et al., 1997; Schaad et al., 2008). In Korea, BFB was first reported in 1991 on watermelon in Gochang, Jeollabuk-do province (Song et al., 1991). Today, occasional outbreaks cause economic problems, and several lawsuits are ongoing between growers and seed companies.

BFB is known to be a seed-borne disease, and seed infestations are the result of blossom contamination with A. citrulli, which can localize in the embryo and endosperm tissue of seeds (Lessl et al., 2007). This bacterium causes seedling blight, necrosis of the true leaves, extensive stem necrosis, and fruit blotch. On fruit, water-soaked lesions progress through the rind, and the fruit decays and cracks. Sometimes this happens close to harvest time, causing devastating and unrecoverable losses.

Chemical treatments, such as copper-containing bactericide/fungicide application on infested fields, are ineffective (Hopkins, 1991), and there is currently no complete and monogenic resistant cultivar available. Because the disease is seed-borne, use of pathogen-free seed is a priority for disease control. Seed can be produced in areas with cool and dry climates that have a lower chance of BFB development. Seed can be treated with antibiotics and disinfectants such as streptomycin, sodium hypochlorite, and hydrochloric acid (Hopkins et al., 1996, 2003). However, as A. citrulli is localized under the seed coat (Lane and Latin, 1992), the control efficacy of external treatments varies widely (Hopkins et al., 2003; Rane and Latin, 1992). Treatment of the seed at 85° for 3–5 days can effectively remove the pathogen, but can reduce germination (Kubota et al., 2012).

Recently, ‘phage therapy’ or ‘bacteriophage biocontrol’ of plant disease, which are applications of bacteriophages for control of bacterial disease, is attracting public attention due to the prevalence of drug resistant bacteria and contamination of food and the environment with over-used antibiotics (Sharma et al., 2017). In this study, we isolated and characterized bacteriophages that infect A. citrulli for the first time, which can be used bacteriophage biocontrol of BFB.

Eighteen strains of A. citrulli were kindly provided by Professor Changsik Oh of Kyung Hee University and were genotyped using a PCR assay with the primers G2AcFwd (5′-CGATAGGGTTGGGTTCAAG-3′), G12AcFwd (5′-CCGAAGAGATAACACTGCATC-3′) and G12AcRev (5′-ACGTACTGCCGATTTTTGC-3′) (Zivanovic and Walcott, 2016). A. citrulli strains were grown on King’s medium B Base (KB) at 34°C for 48 h.

Samples for phage isolation were collected from 96 sites around the Korean Peninsula. Samples included soil from watermelon farms, and leaves of watermelon, pumpkin, and cucumber plants. Approximately 10 g of leaf or soil sample was mixed with sterilized distilled water for 30 min, then centrifuged at 3000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was filtered through Minisart filters (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) with a 0.2-μm pore size. The presence of phages was determined through a spotting assay against different A. citrulli strains. For the spotting assay, 300 μl of exponential phase A. citrulli was mixed with 4 ml KB top agar, overlaid on KB media, and left to solidify at room temperature for 20 to 30 min. Filtered sample water (3 μl) was spotted on the solidified top agar and incubated at 34°C overnight. Among the 96 samples, six, including three watermelon leaves, two pumpkin leaves, and one cucumber leaf sample, were positive in the spot assay. The plaque assay was conducted three times using the wash solution described above to obtain a pure culture of bacteriophages. Plaques were picked using sterilized pipette tips with the ends cut, and were maintained in SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-Cl). Considering the large number of samples, the percentage corresponding to six positive samples (6.25%) is quite low. Although it has been reported that there are an average of 1.5 × 107 phages per gram of soil (Ashelford et al., 2003), it is estimated that there are up to over 109 bacterial cells in the same amount of soil (Torsvik and Øvreås, 2002). Thus, the chance of isolating phages that infect a specific bacterium is still low. One method to overcome this problem is enrichment of the phage population in samples through addition of the proper medium for the bacterial host, along with the corresponding host or a mixture of host strains, followed by incubation and phage isolation by plaque assay. In the following experiment, we performed these enrichment steps and were able to isolate several phages. On the other hand, isolation of all six phages from leaves was an unexpected result, considering the harsh conditions, such as UV radiation, present on the leaf surface. The phyllosphere is known to be the location where phages can most readily be isolated, although how the phages get there is not yet understood. It has been suggested that they originate in the soil from which the plant germinated or are deposited by insect vectors (Buttimer et al., 2017).

It is known that bacteriophages that produce larger plaques have bigger burst sizes (Abedon and Culle, 2007). If a phage is going to be used for bacteriophage biocontrol, it will be necessary to produce a large amount of phages. Therefore, we selected a phage called ACP17, which produced the largest plaques among the six phages isolated. The one-step growth curve also revealed that the eclipse and latent periods of ACP17 were 25 ± 5 min and 50 ± 5 min, respectively and the burst size was 120.

Phage ACP17 was amplified for EM observation and genome analysis following previously published protocols with minor modifications (Bonilla et al., 2016), including ultracentrifugation on a CsCl density gradient of 1.25, 1.37, and 1.50 g/ml. Purified phage ACP17 was placed on 300 mesh copper grid, negatively stained with 4% uracil acetate, and observed with a transmission electron microscope (H-7500, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at the Center for Research Facilities of Pukyong National University. Phage sizes were measured using the software ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). EM observation showed a clear picture of a head measuring 100 ± 5 nm and tail 150 ± 5 nm in length, indicating that phage ACP17 is a member of the family Myoviridae (Fig. 1). The family Myoviridae is composed of diverse phages with different burst sizes and infection processes. Thus, the burst size, eclipse period, and latent period are within the ranges of viruses in the Myoviridae family. For example, bacteriophage J2, which infects the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, belongs to the Myoviridae family and has a latent period of 60 min and burst size of 100–110 plaque-forming units (PFU) per infected cell showed a similar one-step growth curve to ACP17 (Bhunchoth et al., 2015).

Fig. 1

Electron micrograph of ACP17 using negative staining.

One possible application of ACP17 is for control of BFB. There are two genotypes of A. citrulli, genotype I and II (Tao et al., 2009), which can be differentiated via PCR, as described above. ACP17 was tested for its lytic activity against 18 host strains; 16 of genotype I and 2 of genotype II. As shown in Table 1, ACP17 could lyse all 16 strains of genotype I and one strain of genotype II. Between the two genotypes, genotype II is the major causal agent of BFB in watermelon. Although the number of tested genotype II strains is limited, the inability of ACP17 to lyse all genotype II strains poses a problem for the application of this phage in bacteriophage biocontrol. However, more extensive investigation using more host strains, especially of genotype II, is necessary.

Host range of phage ACP17

One concern for the use of bacteriophage biocontrol in plant disease is the stability of phage particles. Although purified phage can be applied directly, it can also be mixed with other chemical components, such as antibiotics for their synergistic action (Borah et al., 2000; Frampton et al., 2012). After application, phages will face harsh conditions and the stability of phages is important for therapeutic application. Among various external physical and chemical factors that affect the survivability of bacteriophages, temperature and pH are crucial (Jończyk et al., 2011). The stability of ACP17 was tested at different pH and temperature levels. Purified ACP17 was added (approximately 4.0 × 105 PFU/ml) to SM buffer that had been adjusted to pH 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, or 12 and incubated for 24 h at room temperature prior to plaque assays with the A. citrulli strain NWB SC196. As shown in Fig. 2, ACP17 was stable over the pH range of 6 to 9, but the titer decreased at pH 5 and showed complete inactivation at pH 2 and 12. Similarly, the stability of ACP17 was tested at different temperatures by incubating the phage (approximately 4.0 × 105 PFU/ml) for 24 h at −20, 4, 25, 34, 37, 45, and 60°C before performing plaque assays. The results shown in Fig. 2 reveal that ACP17 is stable at temperatures ranging from −20 to 45°C, but is inactivated at 60°C. These results suggest that ACP17 will be stable during regular mixing processes, but heating at high temperature for formulation or long-term storage at high temperature should be avoided (Gill and Hyman, 2010; Lim et al., 2013).

Fig. 2

Stability of ACP17 under various pH (top) and temperature (bottom) conditions analyzed by plaque assay. Results are the average of three replicates and the vertical bars indicate standard deviation.

Total nucleic acid was isolated from the purified virus and subjected to digestion with DNase, RNase, and exonuclease. As expected, nucleic acid extracted from ACP17 was digested by DNase and exonuclease but not by RNase, indicating that the nucleic acid is linear double-stranded DNA (data not shown). Genomic library construction and sequence analysis of ACP17 was performed by Teragene Korea Co., Seoul, Korea. Purified genomic DNA was randomly sheared to yield DNA fragments with an average size of 350 base pairs (bp) using a Corvaris S2 Ultrasonicator (Covaris, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA). Library preparation was performed using the Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-free preparation kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego). Further image analysis and base calling were performed with real time analysis (RTA) 2.7.3 and bcl2fastq v2.17.1.14 (Illumina, Inc., San Diego). Normalized reads were assembled using IDBA-UD ver. 1.1.1. (Peng et al., 2012) and contigs were aligned to the NCBI nucleotide database using BLASTN with an E-value cutoff of 1e-10. Alignment results were classified taxonomically using Krona tools (Ondov et al., 2011). Bacteriophage contigs were extracted using an unshared program that we had developed. Gene models were predicted using GeneMark.hmm with Heuristic models (Besemer and Borodovsky, 1999).

Sequence analysis showed that the genome of ACP17, which is deposited in GenBank under accession number KY979132, is composed of 156,281 bp with G + C content of 58.7%, 263 open reading frames (ORF), and 4 transfer RNAs (tRNAs) (Supplementary Table 1). It also revealed that the average length of phage genes is 578.09 bp, with a minimum length of 123 bp and a maximum gene length of 5712 bp. Among the 263 ORFs, 250 are encoded by the plus strand and 13 by the minus strand, while 101 were predicted to encode proteins of known function such as viral structural proteins, proteins involved in virus replication, recombination, transcription, DNA modification, and virus release. In BLAST analysis, among the 101 putative proteins, only 37 and 4 showed homology to those encoded by Stenotrophomonas phage IME-SM1 and Stenotrophomonas SMP1, respectively. The high sequence homology to these two viruses was confirmed using a phylogenetic tree constructed based on the amino acid sequences of the major capsid protein. As shown in Fig. 3, ACP17 showed close relationships with these two phages.

Fig. 3

Phylogenic tree based on the amino acid sequences of the major capsid proteins of selected members of Myoviridae and phage ACP17. Bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

There is no detailed information available about Stenotrophomonas phage IME-SM1, which is a member of the T4virus genus of family Myoviridae, and whose genome sequence was deposited under accession number KR560069.1. Stenotrophomonas phage SMP14 was isolated from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an opportunistic bacterium causing nosocomial infections. Stenotrophomonas phage SMP14 also belongs to the Myoviridae family; it has a head size of 87 × 77 nm, a tail of 129 × 18 nm, and a genome size of 160 kilobases (kb), which makes it smaller than ACP17 but with a similar genome size. Both Acidovorax and Stenotrophomonas belong to the phylum Proteobacteria, but fall into the different classes of Gammaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, respectively. Therefore, the close relationship of ACP17 to these two phages might simply indicate that ACP17 is more closely related to this virus than other known viruses, and this relationship can be resolved after more viruses similar to ACP17 have been isolated. In fact, alignment of the ORFs encoded by ACP17 and Stenotrophomonas phage IME-SM1 showed that ORFs common to both phages are a very limited component of the ORFs encoded by these two phages (Fig. 4). Therefore, we concluded that phage ACP17 is a novel phage first isolated from A. citrulli, and that it has limited homology to phages infecting Stenotrophomonas.

Fig. 4

Comparative analysis of phage open reading frames (ORFs) encoded by phage ACP17 and Stenotrophomonas phage IME-SM1 using using the Easyfig 9 program (http://mjsull.github.io/Easyfig/). Arrows indicate the ORFs and their orientation and lines indicate ORFs with amino acid sequence homology.

Despite homology to the structural proteins of Stenotrophomonas phages, the tail fiber protein of ACP17 showed the highest sequence homology to the Vibrio phage vB_VmeM-32. The ORF that encodes single-stranded DNA-binding proteins shares the highest amino acid sequence homology with that of Prochlorococcus phage P-SSM5. In addition, the putative RNA ligase encoded by ACP17 showed high amino acid sequence homology with that of Ralstonia phage RSP15 and Salmonella phage SSE121. In addition, ACP17 endolysin, which can digest the bacterial cell wall (Walmagh et al., 2013), exhibits homology to Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaS_TRS, isolated from Acinetobacter baumannii (Turner et al., 2016). Therefore, considering the limited homology of proteins encoded by ACP17 to those encoded by two Stenotrophomonas phages and the small number of proteins showing homology to those of other phages, ACP17 is assumed to be a new type of phage isolated for the first time from A. citrulli. The application of ACP17 in bacteriophage biocontrol against BFB will be considered in future research.

Supplementary data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Research Grant from Pukyong National University (year 2016).

References

Abedon ST, Culler RR. 2007;Optimizing bacteriophage plaque fecundity. J Theor Biol 249:582–592. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.006. 17919662.
Ashelford KE, Day MJ, Fry JC. 2003;Elevated abundance of bacteriophage infecting bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:285–289. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.285-289.2003. 12514006. 152412.
Besemer J, Borodovsky M. 1999;Heuristic approach to deriving models for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res 27:3911–3920. 10.1093/nar/27.19.3911. 10481031. 148655.
Bhunchoth A, Phironrit N, Leksomboon C, Chatchawankanphanich O, Kotera S, Narulita E, Kawasaki T, Fujie M, Yamada T. 2015;Isolation of Ralstonia solanacearum-infecting bacteriophages from tomato fields in Chiang Mai, Thailand, and their experimental use as biocontrol agents. J Appl Microbiol 118:1023–1033. 10.1111/jam.12763. 25619754.
Bonilla N, Rojas MI, Cruz GNF, Hung SH, Rohwer F, Barr JJ. 2016;Phage on tap-a quick and efficient protocol for the preparation of bacteriophage laboratory stocks. PeerJ 4:e2261. 10.7717/peerj.2261. 27547567. 4975003.
Borah PK, Jindal JK, Verma JP. 2000;Integrated management of bacterial leaf spot of mungbean with bacteriophages of Xav and chemicals. J Mycol Plant Pathol 30:19–21.
Buttimer C, McAuliffe O, Ross RP, Hill C, O’Mahony J, Coffey A. 2017;Bacteriophages and bacterial plant diseases. Front Microbiol 8:34. 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00034. 28163700. 5247434.
Frampton RA, Pitman AR, Fineran PC. 2012;Advances in bacteriophage-mediated control of plant pathogens. Int J Microbiol 2012;:326452. 22934116. 3426239.
Gill JJ, Hyman P. 2010;Phage choice, isolation, and preparation for phage therapy. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11:2–14. 10.2174/138920110790725311.
Hopkins DL. 1991;Chemical control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 104:270–272.
Hopkins DL, Cucuzza JD, Watterson JC. 1996;Wet seed treatments for the control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon. Plant Dis 80:529–532. 10.1094/PD-80-0529.
Hopkins DL, Lovic B, Hilgren J, Thompson CM. 2003;Wet seed treatment with peroxyacetic acid for the control of bacterial fruit blotch and other seedborne diseases of watermelon. Plant Dis 87:1495–1499. 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.12.1495.
Isakeit T, Black MC, Barnes LW, Jones JB. 1997;First report of infection of honeydew with Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Plant Dis 81:694–694. 10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.6.694C.
Jończyk E, Kłak M, Międzybrodzki R, Górski A. 2011;The influence of external factors on bacteriophages. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 56:191–200. 10.1007/s12223-011-0039-8.
Kubota M, Hagiwara N, Shirakawa T. 2012;Disinfection of seeds of cucurbit crops infested with Acidovorax citrulli with dry heat treatment. J Phytopathol 160:364–368. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2012.01913.x.
Latin RX, Rane KK. 1990;Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon in Indiana. Plant Dis 74:331–335. 10.1094/PD-74-0331B.
Lessl JT, Fessehaie A, Walcott RR. 2007;Colonization of female watermelon blossoms by Acidovorax avenae ssp. citrulli and the relationship between blossom inoculum dosage and seed infestation. J Phytopathol 155:114–121. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01204.x.
Lim JA, Jee S, Lee DH, Roh E, Jung K, Oh C, Heu S. 2013;Biocontrol of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum using bacteriophage PP1. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1147–1153. 10.4014/jmb.1304.04001. 23727798.
Peng Y, Leung HC, Yiu SM, Chin FY. 2012;IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28:1420–1428. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174. 22495754.
Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2011;Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinformatics 12:385. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385. 21961884. 3190407.
Rane KK, Latin RX. 1992;Bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon: association of the pathogen with seed. Plant Dis 76:509–512. 10.1094/PD-76-0509.
Schaad NW, Postnikova E, Sechler A, Claflin LE, Vidaver AK, Jones JB, Agarkova I, Ignatov A, Dickstein E, Ramundo BA. 2008;Reclassification of subspecies of Acidovorax avenae as A. Avenae (Manns 1905) emend., A. cattleyae (Pavarino, 1911) comb. nov., A. citrulli Schaad et al., 1978) comb. nov., and proposal of A. oryzae sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 31:434–446. 10.1016/j.syapm.2008.09.003. 18993005.
Sharma S, Chatterjee S, Datta S, Prasad R, Dubey D, Prasad RK, Vairale MG. 2017;Bacteriophages and its applications: an overview. Folia Microbiol 62:17–55. 10.1007/s12223-016-0471-x.
Song WY, Kim HM, Son IY, Kang YK. 1991;Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes subsp. citrulli: The causal agent of bacterial fruit blotch rot on watermelon. Korean J Plant Pathol 7:177–18.
Tao C, Guo-Liang Q, Xiao-Li Y, Jun-Yi M, Bai-Shi H, Feng-Quan L. 2009;Detection of a quorum sensing signal molecule of Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli and its regulation of pathogenicity. Chin J Agric Biotechnol 6:49–53. 10.1017/S1479236209002514.
Torsvik V, Øvreås L. 2002;Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems. Curr Opin Microbiol 5:240–245. 10.1016/S1369-5274(02)00324-7. 12057676.
Turner D, Wand ME, Sutton JM, Centron D, Kropinski AM, Reynolds DM. 2016;A viable prophage isolated from Acinetobacter baumannii strain A118. Genome announc 4:e01051–16. 10.1128/genomeA.01051-16. 5064099.
Walmagh M, Boczkowska B, Grymonprez B, Briers Y, Drulis-Kawa Z, Lavigne R. 2013;Characterization of five novel endolysins from Gram-negative infecting bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:4369–4375. 10.1007/s00253-012-4294-7.
Willems A, Goor M, Thielemans S, Gillis M, Kersters K, De Ley J. 1992;Transfer of several phytopathogenic Pseudomonas species to Acidovorax as Acidovorax avenae subsp. avenae subsp. nov., comb. nov., Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli, Acidovorax avenae subsp. cattleyae, and Acidovorax konjaci. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 42:107–119.
Zivanovic M, Walcott RR. 2016;Further characterization of genetically distinct groups of Acidovorax citrulli strains. Phytopathology 107:29–35. 10.1094/PHYTO-06-16-0245-R. 27618192.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Electron micrograph of ACP17 using negative staining.

Fig. 2

Stability of ACP17 under various pH (top) and temperature (bottom) conditions analyzed by plaque assay. Results are the average of three replicates and the vertical bars indicate standard deviation.

Fig. 3

Phylogenic tree based on the amino acid sequences of the major capsid proteins of selected members of Myoviridae and phage ACP17. Bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per site.

Fig. 4

Comparative analysis of phage open reading frames (ORFs) encoded by phage ACP17 and Stenotrophomonas phage IME-SM1 using using the Easyfig 9 program (http://mjsull.github.io/Easyfig/). Arrows indicate the ORFs and their orientation and lines indicate ORFs with amino acid sequence homology.

Table 1

Host range of phage ACP17

 Group   No  Strains Host  Lysis activity of ACP17 
I 1  NWB SC107  Watermelon +
2 NWB SC108 Watermelon +
3 NWB SC109 Watermelon +
4 NWB SC111 Watermelon +
5 NWB SC172 Watermelon, fruit +
6 NWB SC187 Watermelon +
7 NWB SC196 Watermelon, stem  +
8 NWB SC201 Watermelon +
9 NWB SC206 Watermelon, stem +
10 NWB SC212 cucumber, +
11 NWB SC238 Watermelon, leaf +
12 NWB SC058 Melon +
13 NWB SC076 Watermelon +
14 NWB SC175 Cucumber +
15 NWB SC195 Watermelon, leaf +
16 NWB SC202 Watermelon +

II 17 NWB SC074 Watermelon
18 KHU Watermelon +